Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0213653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213653

Table 2. Performance of all prediction models under consideration.

Model AUC-ROC Absolute AUC-ROC Change
Framingham Score 0.724 ± 0.004 Baseline model
Cox PH Model (7 core variables) 0.734 ± 0.005 + 1.0%
Cox PH Model (all variables) 0.758 ± 0.005 + 3.4%
Support Vector Machines 0.709 ± 0.061 - 1.5%
Random Forest 0.730 ± 0.004 + 0.6%
Neural Networks 0.755 ± 0.005 + 3.1%
AdaBoost 0.759 ± 0.004 + 3.5%
Gradient Boosting 0.769 ± 0.005 + 4.5%
AutoPrognosis (7 core variables) 0.744 ± 0.005 + 2.0%
AutoPrognosis (369 non-lab. variables) 0.761 ± 0.005 + 3.7%
AutoPrognosis (104 lab. variables) 0.735 ± 0.008 + 1.1%
AutoPrognosis (all variables) 0.774 ± 0.005 + 5.0%

The Framingham score is provided as the reference model for comparative purposes.