Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2018 Aug 22;84(6):1201–1213. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy378

TABLE 2.

Hurst Versus Distance Model Comparisons.

	Anatomical parcellation						Randomised parcellation
	Discovery		Validation		Complete		Discovery		Validation		Complete
Fitting	R²	AIC	R²	AIC	R²	AIC	R²	AIC	R²	AIC	R²	AIC
Linear	0.02	−9.70	0.056	−10.48	0.004	−11.15	0.02	−10.80	0.00	−10.55	0.005	−12.04
Quadratic	0.07	−9.77	0.085	−10.51	0.057	−11.23	0.12	−10.99	0.02	−10.56	0.099	−12.20
Cubic	0.06	−9.72	0.084	−10.48	0.052	−11.19	0.11	−10.92	0.02	−10.52	0.091	−12.15
Exponential	0.02	−9.70	0.055	−10.48	0.004	−11.15	0.02	−10.80	0.00	−10.55	0.005	−12.04
Exponential + Intersect	0.02	−9.67	0.055	−10.45	0.003	−11.12	0.02	−10.76	0.00	−10.51	0.001	−12.00

The best fitting model in terms of maximal AIC is highlighted in bold typeface. R² = coefficient of determination, AIC = Akaike Information Criteria.