Table 1.

Comparison of genotyping and predicted phenotypic blood typing results according to the original and new SNV panel of 2145 purpose-bred cats.

New SNV panel					Original SNV panel
Genotype	c.179G>Ta	c.268T>A2	c.364C>T3	c.1322delT4	c.142G>A2	Δ−53b	Genotype		Number of cats	Predicted phenotype
A/A	GG	TT	CC	TT	GG	NN	A/A		1290	A (91.7%)
	GG	TT	CC	TT	GG	NP	Discordant		93
	GG	TT	CC	TT	GG	PP	Discordant		2
A/b	GG GT GG	TA TT TT	CC CC CC	TT TT T*	GA GG GG	NP NN NN	A/b A/A A/A		488 15 37
	GG	TA	CC	TT	GG	NP	Discordant		3
	GG	TA	CC	TT	AA	NP	Discordant		1
A/ac	GG	TT	CT	TT	GG	NN	A/A		37
	GG	TT	CT	TT	GG	NP	Discordant		1
	GG	TT	CT	TT	GA	NN	Discordant		1
ac/b	GG	TA	CT	TT	GA	NP	A/b		4	C (0.7%)
	GG	TT	CT	T*	GG	NN	A/A		8
ac / ac	GG	TT	TT	TT	GG	NN	A/A		3
b/b	GG	AA	CC	TT	AA	PP	b/b		145	B (7.6%)
	TT	TT	CC	TT					x
	GG	TT	CC	**	GG	NN	A/A		7
	GT	TA	CC	TT	AA	NP	Discordant		4
	GG	TA	CC	T*	GA	NP	A/b		6
	GT	TT	CC	T*					x

N not present, P present;

^*deletion, X not seen.

¹Omi et al. 2016;

²Bighignoli et al. 2007; Gandolfi et al. 2016

^dKehl et al. 2018.