Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nanomedicine. 2019 Feb 20;17:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.02.002

Table 1: Nanomaterials tested in this study.

Before analysis in biological assays, all particles were analyzed by dynamic light scattering or, where applicable, by transmission electron microscopy to determine particle size. Zeta-potential was determined for all materials studied by DLS. The details of characterization were published before and shown in the supplementary section. Representative flow cytometry images in support of the data summarized in the column “complement on the cell surface” are shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

Nanoparticles Size, nm Complement on the cell surface
Nanoparticles with demonstrated ability to contribute to protein immunogenicity and cause delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions Au 5, 30, 80, 250 Not detected
Ag (PVP and citrate stabilized) 20, 110 Not detected
Ni 200–400, with aggregates up to 700 Not detected
Zinc Oxide 30 with aggregates up to 1400 Not detected
Nanoparticles With demonstrated ability to activate plasma complement and cause CARPA in sensitive individuals PEGylated liposomes 89 Not detected
Ambisome 110–120 Not detected
Propofol 208 Not detected
Feraheme ~25 Not detected
Cremophor 15 Not detected
Nanoparticles with a known ability to disrupt or perturb cellular organelles Silica more than 1 μm Not detected
Silicon more than 1 μm Not detected
Nanosilica 180, with aggregate up more than 1 μm Not detected
G5 PAMAM amine- and guanidine terminated dendrimers 6.5 Detected
G5 triazine dendrimers 8.0 Detected