Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;33(5):513–522. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00626-2

Table 4.

Serum luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and progesterone concentrations following administration of COC alone or COC and erenumab

COC alone COC and erenumab Difference (COC and erenumab vs COC alone)
Luteinizing hormone (IU/L)
 Median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile)a 3.4 (1.0, 6.3) 3.6 (1.9, 5.7) − 0.2 (− 1.6, 1.1)
 Mean (SD)a 4.5 (5.8) 4.6 (4.9) 0.2 (3.1)
Follicle-stimulating hormone (IU/L)
 Median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile)a 3.1 (2.2, 4.4) 4.0 (1.4, 5.3) 0.3 (− 0.7, 2.0)
 Mean (SD)a 3.4 (2.1) 4.3 (3.0) 1.2 (3.2)
Progesterone (nmol/L)
 Median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile)b 1.8 (1.1, 2.3) 2.2 (1.3, 4.3) 0.33 (− 1.3, 2.0)
 Mean (SD)b 4.8 (12.2) 3.7 (3.7) − 2.4 (13.9)
 Median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile)c 2.2 (1.6, 10.4) 0.03 (− 0.9, 7.9)
 Mean (SD)c 13.3 (22.1) 3.1 (10.7)
 Median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile)d 1.5 (1.4, 1.9) − 0.29 (− 0.6, 0.3)
 Mean (SD)d 6.1 (12.9) 0.9 (3.8)

Data represent median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile)

COC combined oral contraceptive, SD standard deviation

Samples collected on:

aDay 14 of cycle 2 (COC alone) and cycle 3 (COC and erenumab)

bDay 21 of cycle 2 (COC alone) and Day 21 of cycle 3 (COC and erenumab)

cStudy day 105

dStudy day 133