Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;10:2176. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09976-3

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of signals of bacterial association

Gene ID Gene name OR (NL) p-value (NL) OR (SA) p-value (SA) Combined p-value
SPN23F05680 ldcB/dacB 1.39 2.8 × 10–19 1.13 9.6 × 10–8 5.4 × 10–21
SPN23F22240 pspC/cbpA 1.00 8.1 × 10–1 1.12 4.7 × 10–12 5.3 × 10–11
SPN23F08080 spnTVR hsdS 0.82 1.9 × 10–4 1.09 4.2 × 10–6 7.5 × 10–2
SPN23F17820 psrP −2.27 (invasive)
−0.14 (carriage)
<1 × 10–6 −2.61 (invasive)
−2.62 (carriage)
4.5 × 10–4 <1 × 10–6
SPN23F10590 zmpD 1.17 8.6 × 10–13 1.12 2.5 × 10–5 8.4 × 10–14
SPN23F09820 FM211187.3090 1.37 5.0 × 10–23 1.30 1.9 × 10–33 3.4 × 10–54
SPN23F05670 FM211187.1804 1.47 1.8 × 10–30 1.22 2.9 × 10–25 8.3 × 10–51
SPN23F04740 ecsA 1.20 1.8 × 10–7 1.11 9.7 × 10–4 1.8 × 10–8
SPN23F11460 mcrB 1.45 3.7 × 10–8 1.11 9.5 × 10–5 1.2 × 10–6

As in Table 2, showing behaviour of signals in The Netherlands (NL) and South African (SA) cohorts individually. The p value is from meta-analysis of the two cohorts using METAL to compute a combined z value, so is different from the p value in Table 2, which was computed by applying an LMM to all samples

OR odds ratio