Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 11;11(4):823. doi: 10.3390/nu11040823

Table 5.

Quality, measured in %, of the included AMD clinical guidelines, based on the six assessment domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) appraisal tool. The scores for each of the six domains were calculated by summing up all the scores of the individual items for that domain, and then scaling the total as a percentage of the maximum possible score for each domain.

Clinical Guideline AGREE II Domains (%)
Scope and
Purpose
Stakeholder
Involvement
Rigour of
Development
Clarity of
Presentation
Applicability Editorial
Independence
American Optical Association 2004 52.8 30.6 9.2 30.6 10.9 87.5
International Council of Ophthalmology 2007 58.3 30.6 10.2 58.3 2.2 0.0
Spanish Retina and Vitreous Society 2009 63.9 41.7 21.4 36.1 13.0 0.0
Canadian Expert Consensus 2012 75.0 47.2 36.7 75.0 28.3 20.8
German Ophthalmological Society 2014 30.6 25.0 19.4 52.8 0.0 0.0
Eye Health Council of Ontario (Canada) 2015 61.1 22.2 14.3 41.7 13.0 20.8
National Health Committee (New Zealand) 2015 75.0 13.9 20.4 55.6 30.4 0.0
American Academy of Ophthalmology 2015 83.3 63.9 72.4 94.4 17.4 75.0
Vitreo-Retina Society of the Philippines 2016 83.3 44.4 56.1 88.9 13.0 45.8
NICE Clinical Knowledge Summary (CKS) 2016 88.9 83.3 68.4 91.7 39.1 87.5
Clinical Advisory Committee (United States) 2017 52.8 22.2 9.2 44.4 4.3 0.0
NICE Guideline (NG82) 2018 94.4 88.9 95.9 100.0 97.8 100.0
Optometry Australia 2019 83.3 41.7 19.4 75.0 19.6 0.0
Median (range) 75.0
(range 30.6 to 94.4%)
41.7
(range 13.9 to 88.9%)
20.4
(range 9.2 to 95.9)
58.3
(range 30.6 to 100%)
13.0
(range 2.2 to 97.8%)
20.8
(range 0 to 100%)