Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 9;11(4):333. doi: 10.3390/v11040333

Table 1.

Prevalence studies of norovirus (NoV) in bivalve mollusks.

Country Type of Shellfish Production Areas Dates of Sampling NoV Prevalence (Total Number of Analyzed Samples) Prevalence of NoV GI Prevalence of NoV GII Data on Viral Load a
→ % Positive Samples
Ref.
EUROPE
Belgium Oysters, clams and mussels (raw and frozen) Seafood company 2012–2013 32.3% (n = 65) 24.6% 13.8% 3.3 × 103–1.4 × 104 →42.6% [44]
France Oysters ND ND 14% (n = 78) ND ND ND [13]
France Mussels Thermally-treated shellfish; imported from different countries as frozen 2008 21.7% (n = 83) 8.4% 11.4% ND [42]
France Oysters A and B 2010–2011 9% (n = 387) 1.6% 8.3% Range: 9.3 × 101–2.2 × 102 [27]
Ireland Oysters A and B 2005–2007 37.1% (n = 167) ND ND ND [45]
Ireland Oysters A and B 2009–2011 88.1% (Nov-March)
50.9% (April-Oct) (n = 113)
ND ND Average Nov-March: 1.3 × 103
Average April-Oct: 2.1 × 102
[13]
Ireland Oysters Point of sale 2015–2016 84% (n = 25) ND ND Geometric mean (95% CI): 69 (40–120) [30]
Italy Clams and mussels (before and after depuration) A and B 2005–2006 8.3% (0% in depurated samples) (n = 120) 3.3% 5% ND [32]
Italy Clams, mussels and oysters B 2008–2009 51.4% (n = 70) 37.1% 48.6% ND [46]
Italy Clams, mussels, oysters and others A and B 2008–2012 51.5% (n = 336) 26.5% 45.4% Average A area: 3.1 × 102
Average B area: 1.9 × 103
[47]
Italy Mussels and razor shells A and natural beds 2011–2012 18.7% (n = 59) 6.8% 11.9% ND [48]
Italy Clams, mussels, oysters and others A and product at retail 2003–2011 4.2% (n = 4359) ND ND ND [49]
Italy Mussels and clams A and B, as well as shellfish from registered and unregistered retailers (street vendors) 2007–2010 57.5% (n = 163) 29.4% 56.4% ND [33]
Italy Mussels A and B 2014–2015 23.1% (n = 108) 9.3% 20.4% Average GI: 1.0 × 102
Average GII: 0.6 × 102
(range 1.2 × 102–5.8 × 107)
[50]
Italy Mussels, clams, oysters, and others A and B 2013–2015 14.2% (n = 253) 1.6% 12.2% ND [51]
Montenegro Mussels A and B 2015–2016 43% (n = 72) 19.4% 37.5% Range GI: 10–1.2 × 103
Range GII: 10–1.2 × 104
[31]
Netherlands Oysters Point of sale 2015–2016 31% (n = 29) ND ND Geometric mean (95% CI): 49 (40–91) [30]
Spain (Galicia) Clams, cockles, mussels B and C 2005 56% (n = 41) 7.3% 53.7% Range: 5.6 × 101–1.5 × 104 [52]
Spain (Galicia) Mussels B and C 2010–2012 49.4% (n = 81) 8.6% 30.8% Range: 5.9 × 103–1.6 × 109 [34]
Spain (Galicia) Clams, cockles, mussels B 2011–2012 45.2% (n = 168) 32.1% 25.6% <102→9.5 %
102–103→31.6 %
103–104→37.9 %
104–105→20 %
>105→1 %
[35]
UK Oysters B 2004–2006 48% (n = 14) 41.4% 40% ND [28]
UK and Scotland Oysters 39 areas, A, B and C 2009–2011 76.2% (n = 844) 67.4% 54.5% <102→63.5 %
102–103→21.9 %
103–104→13.5 %
[29]
UK Oysters Point of sale 2015–2016 71.7% (n = 434) ND ND Geometric mean (95% CI): 78 (40–277) [30]
ASIA AND AUSTRALIA
Australia Oysters Growing areas with risk of pollution 2010–2011 1.7% (n = 120) 0% 1.7% ND [53]
Australia Oysters All major oyster harvest areas within the country 2014–2015 <2% (n = 300) 0% 0% ND [54]
China Clams, mussels, oysters and others Retail 2009–2011 13.3% (n = 840) ND ND <102→37.4%
102–103→46.1%
103–104→13.9%
>104→2.6%
[55]
Japan Oysters A and B 2002 9% (n = 191) 7.4% 1.6% <102→35.3 %
102–103→41.2 %
103–104→17.6 %
>104→5.9 %
[56]
Vietnam Oysters ND 2016–2016 ND (n = 34) 79% 42% Max GI: 2.4 × 105
Mas GII: 2.3 × 104
[18]
AFRICA
Morocco Clams, cockles and oysters ND 2006–2010 29.9% (n = 77) 20.8% 18.2% Average clams: 2.1 × 102
Average cockles: 2.8 × 102
[57]
UNITED STATES (US)
US (Louisiana) Oysters A and B 2013 0.2% (n = 440) 0% 0.2% 3.4 × 103 [58]
US Oysters ND 2007 3.9% (n = 338) 1% 2.9% ND [59]

a Viral load is expressed as genome copies per gram of digestive tissue; ND: Not determined; CI: confidence interval.