Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 22;11(4):903. doi: 10.3390/nu11040903

Table 2.

Associations of famine exposure with central obesity risk in different severity of famine areas

Nonexposed Fetal-Exposed Infant-Exposed
Central Obesity in 2002
Waist circumference (cm) 77.7 (9.4) 78.8 (9.6) 78.5 (9.6)
Prevalence (%) 15.5 19.4 18.9
Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.31 (1.19–1.44) 1.28 (1.17–1.40)
p <0.0001 <0.0001
Stratified by famine severity
Moderately exposed
Waist circumference (cm) 78.5 (9.6) 79.5 (9.9) 79.8 (9.9)
Prevalence (%) 18.0 22.4 23.2
Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.32 (1.14–1.52) 1.40 (1.23–1.60)
p 0.0002 0.0075
Severely exposed
Waist circumference (cm) 77.1 (9.2) 78.2 (9.3) 77.5 (9.2)
Prevalence (%) 14.0 17.0 15.9
Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.24 (1.08–1.42) 1.17 (1.03–1.32)
p 0.0022 0.0139
Central Obesity in 2012
Waist circumference (cm) 82.6 (9.8) 83.1 (9.7) 82.7 (9.8)
Prevalence (%) 31.6 33.3 32.6
Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.09 (1.00–1.19) 1.04 (0.97–1.13)
p 0.0493 0.2823
Stratified by famine severity
Moderately exposed
Waist circumference (cm) 82.9 (9.9) 83.2 (9.9) 82.9 (9.7)
Prevalence (%) 33.0 33.5 33.6
Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.03 (0.91–1.17) 1.02 (0.91–1.15)
p 0.6473 0.7145
Severely exposed
Waist circumference (cm) 82.4 (9.7) 82.9 (9.5) 82.6 (9.8)
Prevalence (%) 30.6 33.2 31.9
Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.00 (Ref) 1.13 (1.01–1.27) 1.05 (0.95–1.16)
p 0.0331 0.3327

All odds ratios used the nonexposed group as the reference. Odds ratio (95% CI): adjusted for sex, residential areas, education level, marital status, household income, current drinking status, current smoking status, and physical activity.