Table 3.

Model Statistics.

Paths	b-values	SE	z-score	Cohens d	95% CI
Monitor (T1)
Permissiveness (T1)	−0.02	0.01	−1.52	.00	−0.04, 0.01
Drink (T1)
Permissiveness (T1)	2.39	0.21	11.38	.31	2.03, 2.86
Monitor (T1)	1.26	0.66	1.90	.05	0.09, 2.66
Consequences (T1)
Drink (T1)	1.94	0.09	21.70	.57	1.77, 2.13
Permissiveness (T2)
Permissiveness (T1)	0.29	0.03	9.67	.33	0.24, 0.36
Monitor (T1)	−0.39	0.11	−3.56	.09	−0.64, −0.19
Drink (T1)	0.02	0.01	2.91	.53	0.01, 0.03
Consequences (T1)	−0.01	0.00	0.00	.00	−0.01, 0.00
Monitor (T2)
Permissiveness(T1)	−0.01	0.02	−0.44	.01	−0.04, 0.02
Monitor (T1)	0.50	0.07	6.78	.18	0.37, 0.66
Drink (T1)	0.00	0.00	0.00	.00	−0.01, 0.01
Consequences (T1)	0.00	0.00	0.00	.00	−0.00, 0.00
Permissiveness (T2)	−0.04	0.02	−1.92	.00	−0.09, 0.00
Drink (T2)
Permissiveness (T1)	0.06	0.25	0.24	.00	−0.43, 0.55
Monitor (T1)	0.83	0.84	0.99	.00	−0.73, 2.53
Drink (T1)	0.98	0.10	9.76	.26	0.80, 1.19
Consequences (T1)	−0.12	0.03	−3.71	.11	−0.18, −0.06
Permissiveness (T2)	0.81	0.30	2.72	.07	0.23, 1.36
Monitor (T2)	0.70	0.60	1.16	.03	−0.46, 1.91
Consequences (T2)
Permissiveness (T1)	0.12	0.56	0.21	.01	−1.00, 1.28
Monitor (T1)	0.62	1.49	0.42	.00	−2.13, 3.65
Drink (T1)	−0.82	0.31	−2.65	.07	−1.47, −0.24
Consequences (T1)	0.59	0.09	6.85	.17	0.43, 0.76
Drink (T2)	1.83	0.19	9.72	.26	1.49, 2.23
Sex	2.02	0.90	2.25	.05	0.24, 3.77
Peer Approval	0.34	0.37	0.92	.02	−0.38, 1.07
Campusd1	−2.37	1.11	−2.14	.05	−4.43, −0.16
Campusd2	−3.40	1.07	−3.18	.07	−5.40, −1.27

Note: Bolded b-values indicate significance. Campusd=campus dummy code.