Table 3.
Paths | b-values | SE | z-score | Cohens d | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monitor (T1) | |||||
Permissiveness (T1) | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.52 | .00 | −0.04, 0.01 |
Drink (T1) | |||||
Permissiveness (T1) | 2.39 | 0.21 | 11.38 | .31 | 2.03, 2.86 |
Monitor (T1) | 1.26 | 0.66 | 1.90 | .05 | 0.09, 2.66 |
Consequences (T1) | |||||
Drink (T1) | 1.94 | 0.09 | 21.70 | .57 | 1.77, 2.13 |
Permissiveness (T2) | |||||
Permissiveness (T1) | 0.29 | 0.03 | 9.67 | .33 | 0.24, 0.36 |
Monitor (T1) | −0.39 | 0.11 | −3.56 | .09 | −0.64, −0.19 |
Drink (T1) | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.91 | .53 | 0.01, 0.03 |
Consequences (T1) | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .00 | −0.01, 0.00 |
Monitor (T2) | |||||
Permissiveness(T1) | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.44 | .01 | −0.04, 0.02 |
Monitor (T1) | 0.50 | 0.07 | 6.78 | .18 | 0.37, 0.66 |
Drink (T1) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .00 | −0.01, 0.01 |
Consequences (T1) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .00 | −0.00, 0.00 |
Permissiveness (T2) | −0.04 | 0.02 | −1.92 | .00 | −0.09, 0.00 |
Drink (T2) | |||||
Permissiveness (T1) | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.24 | .00 | −0.43, 0.55 |
Monitor (T1) | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.99 | .00 | −0.73, 2.53 |
Drink (T1) | 0.98 | 0.10 | 9.76 | .26 | 0.80, 1.19 |
Consequences (T1) | −0.12 | 0.03 | −3.71 | .11 | −0.18, −0.06 |
Permissiveness (T2) | 0.81 | 0.30 | 2.72 | .07 | 0.23, 1.36 |
Monitor (T2) | 0.70 | 0.60 | 1.16 | .03 | −0.46, 1.91 |
Consequences (T2) | |||||
Permissiveness (T1) | 0.12 | 0.56 | 0.21 | .01 | −1.00, 1.28 |
Monitor (T1) | 0.62 | 1.49 | 0.42 | .00 | −2.13, 3.65 |
Drink (T1) | −0.82 | 0.31 | −2.65 | .07 | −1.47, −0.24 |
Consequences (T1) | 0.59 | 0.09 | 6.85 | .17 | 0.43, 0.76 |
Drink (T2) | 1.83 | 0.19 | 9.72 | .26 | 1.49, 2.23 |
Sex | 2.02 | 0.90 | 2.25 | .05 | 0.24, 3.77 |
Peer Approval | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.92 | .02 | −0.38, 1.07 |
Campusd1 | −2.37 | 1.11 | −2.14 | .05 | −4.43, −0.16 |
Campusd2 | −3.40 | 1.07 | −3.18 | .07 | −5.40, −1.27 |
Note: Bolded b-values indicate significance. Campusd=campus dummy code.