Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Chem. 2018 Feb 27;90(6):3793–3801. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04077

Table 1.

Topology Analysis by GlycoDeNovo on EED (16 eV) Spectra of Me-PRAGS-Labeled Glycansa

glycan no. Peaks no. interpretable no. candidates rank by SPN rank by IC IC score no. 1 IC score no. 2
LNFP I   186 (77) 30 16   1 (1) 1 (0) 273.56 240.73
LNFP II   203 (81) 35 23  1(11) 1 (0) 303.01 244.55
LNFP III   157 (67) 26 16   1 (4) 1 (0) 313.55 262.32
LNFP V   216 (85) 35 16   1 (9) 1 (0) 213.68 156.47
LNFP VI   199 (81) 40 16   1 (4) 1 (0) 189.68   93.89
LamHex   227 (98) 13 11   1 (0) 1 (0) 337.98 318.02
MalHex 251 (105) 71 11   1 (0) 1 (0) 328.99 274.13
IsomalHex   152 (67) 10 11   1 (0) 1 (0) 264.93 241.41
a

The “no. peaks” column lists the peak number in each enriched spectrum with the number of complementary peaks inside parentheses. The “no. interpretable” column lists the number of peaks that are interpreted as non-reducing-end glycosidic fragments. The “no. candidates” column lists the number of reconstructed topology candidates. The “rank by SPN” and “rank by IC” columns list the ranks of the true topologies among all candidates by their supporting peak counts and by IonClassifier, respectively. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of candidate structures that are ranked as high as the true topology. The last two columns list the IonClassifier scores of the top two-ranked candidate topologies.