Skip to main content
. 2019 May 13;7:e6898. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6898

Table 2. Percentage comparison of each Symbiodiniaceae sub-generic genotype per gene per treatment.

23S (%) chvA12 chvA14 chvA16 chvA19 chvA2 chvC1 HM032148 HM032167
S141 (Pooled) 0.09 0.137 0.209 0.166 80.911 14.897 0.583 3.006
S141 (Control) 0.136 0.146 0.204 0.182 81.4 14.208 0.573 3.151
S142 (Pooled) 0.16 0.156 0.237 0.09 96.504 0 0 2.853
S142 (Control) 0.154 0.125 0.205 0.137 96.59 0 0 2.79
S143 (Pooled) 0.138 0.113 0.237 0.182 95.847 0 0 3.482
S143 (Control) 0.133 0.146 0.236 0.112 95.869 0 0 3.504

Notes:

Percentage comparison of each Symbiodiniaceae sub-generic genotype recovered using the three amplicon markers in “Pooled” versus single “Control” markers (see Table 1). The proportion of each sub-generic type between “Pooled” and “Controls” is almost identical for the 23S marker, but shows some minor differences for the ITS2 and LSU markers (gray shades).

*

One control sample (S143 ITS2 only) failed the sequencing resulting in only 130 raw reads (see Table 1).