Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Mar 14;33(3):331–336. doi: 10.1037/adb0000458

Table 3.

Multilevel model main effects for hypotheses 1 and 2.

Conseauences
Total Social Blackout
b
(SE)
95%
CI
b
(SE)
95%
CI
b
(SE)
95%
CI
Hypothesis 1
Type of Occasion
MJ-only −1.70 (0.33)** [−2.34, −1.06] −0.21 (0.07)** [−0.35, −0.08] −0.63 (0.09)** [−0.82, −0.45]
L-ALC −1.75 (0.19)** [−2.12, −1.39] −0.24 (0.05)** [−0.34, −0.14] −0.64 (0.07)** [−0.79, −0.50]
H-ALC 0.08 (0.16) [−0.23, 0.39] 0.07 (0.04) [−0.02, 0.15] −0.04 (0.06) [−0.16, 0.08]
L-SAM −1.49 (0.33)** [−2.15, −0.83] −0.22 (0.09)** [−0.40, −0.04] −0.61 (0.13)** [−0.87, −0.35]
H-SAM (ref)
Hypothesis 2
Type of Occasion
MJ-only 0.06 (0.33) [−0.60, 0.71] 0.03 (0.07) [−0.11, 0.16] 0.01 (0.10) [−0.18, 0.20]
H-ALC 1.83 (0.12)** [1.60, 2.07] 0.31 (0.03)** [0.24, 0.38] 0.60 (0.05)** [0.51, 0.70]
L-SAM 0.26 (0.34) [−0.40, 0.92] 0.02 (0.09) [−0.16, 0.20] 0.03 (0.13) [−0.23, 0.29]
H-SAM 1.75 (0.19)** [1.39, 2.12] 0.24 (0.05)** [0.14, 0.34] 0.64 (0.07)** [0.50, 0.79]
L-ALC (ref)
Covariates (identical for both models)
MJ-only (Average) −0.91 (160) [−4.05, 2.22] −0.46 (0.33) [−1.11, 0.19] −0.08 (0.53) [−1.13, 0.97]
Alcohol-only (Average) 0.37 (0.41) [−0.44, 1.18] 0.02 (0.09) [−0.15, 0.19] 0.22 (0.14) [−0.06, 0.50]
SAM (Average) 1.55 (0.93) [−0.28, 3.38] 0.36 (0.20) [−0.03, 0.75] 0.20 (0.32) [−0.42, 0.82]
Female 0.47 (0.17)* [0.13, 0.82] 0.06 (0.04) [−0.01, 0.13] 0.15 (0.06)* [0.04, 0.27]
Male (ref.)
Thursday 0.18 (0.10) [−0.02, 0.37] −0.03 (0.03) [−0.09, 0.02] −0.002 (0.04) [−0.08, 0.08]
Friday −0.08 (0.09) [−0.25, 0.10] −0.04 (0.02) [−0.09, 0.01] 0.01 (0.04) [−0.06, 0.07]
Saturday (ref.)
Semester −0.22 (0.05)** [−0.31, −0.12] −0.04 (0.01)* [−0.07, −0.02] −0.08 (0.02)** [−0.11, −0.04]

Notes. MJ-Only = marijuana-only; L-ALC = lighter alcohol-only; H-ALC = heavier alcohol-only; L-SAM = lighter alcohol combined with marijuana; H-SAM = heavier alcohol combined with marijuana. The covariates were included in analyses for both hypotheses; however, they are listed once since their values were the same in both models.

*

p < .01;

**

p < .0001