Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pancreas. 2019 Mar;48(3):323–328. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001248

TABLE 2.

Clinicopathological Correlation of PERK and P-eIF2α Expression in Patients With PDAC

Characteristics PERK-low (%)
(n = 42)
PERK-high (%)
(n = 42)
P p-eIF2α-low (%)
(n = 37)
p-eIF2α-high (%)
(n = 47)
P
Sex 0.66 0.18
 Female 16 (38.1) 18 (42.9) 12 (32.4) 22 (46.8)
 Male 26 (61.9) 24 (57.1) 25 (67.6) 25 (53.2)
Tumor differentiation 0.35 0.46
 Well-Moderate 31 (73.8) 27 (64.3) 24 (64.9) 34 (72.3)
 Poor 11 (26.2) 15 (35.7) 13 (35.1) 13 (27.7)
pT (AJCC 8th edition) 0.46 0.75
 pT1 8 (19.1) 4 (9.5) 5 (13.5) 7 (14.9)
 pT2 29 (69.0) 32 (76.2) 26 (70.3) 35 (74.5)
 pT3 5 (11.9) 6 (14.3) 6 (16.2) 5 (10.6)
pN (AJCC 8th edition) 0.20 0.81
 pN0 11 (26.2) 5 (11.9) 6 (16.2) 10 (21.3)
 pN1 16 (38.1) 16 (38.1) 14 (37.8) 18 (38.3)
 pN2 15 (35.7) 21 (50.0) 17 (46.0) 19 (40.4)
Margin 0.29 0.49
 Negative 39 (92.9) 36 (85.7) 34 (91.9) 41 (87.2)
 Positive 3 (7.1) 6 (14.3) 3 (8.1) 6 (12.8)
Recurrence/metastasis 0.10 0.01
 No 17 (40.5) 9 (21.4) 17 (45.9) 9 (19.1)
 Yes 25 (59.5) 33 (78.6) 20 (54.1) 38 (80.9)