Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2018 Nov 16;35(3):405–417. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12335

Table 2.

Comparing Access to and Use of Health Information Sources between Rural and Urban Residents

ACCESS USE
Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
Sources OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
ALL SOURCES 0.68 0.53, 0.87 .002** 0.85 0.66, 1.10 .208 1.01 0.86, 1.19 .882 1.07 0.91, 1.27 .410
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS 0.70 0.55, 0.88 .003** 0.82 0.65, 1.05 .115 1.00 0.83, 1.20 .970 1.05 0.86, 1.28 .628
 Primary care providers 0.56 0.34, 0.90 .016* 0.65 0.39, 1.08 .094 0.88 0.48, 1.62 .690 1.00 0.53, 1.89 .997
 Nurses 0.68 0.45, 1.03 .069 0.96 0.61, 1.49 .841 1.44 0.94, 2.21 .094 1.68 1.06, 2.64 .026*
 Specialist doctors 0.58 0.41, 0.82 .002** 0.62 0.43, 0.90 .011* 0.78 0.52, 1.17 .229 0.78 0.50, 1.21 .266
 Pharmacists 0.73 0.49, 1.11 .144 0.87 0.56, 1.36 .549 1.34 0.92, 1.94 .126 1.37 0.93, 2.04 .114
 Veterinarians 0.84 0.57, 1.23 .359 0.86 0.57, 1.29 .461 1.53 0.66, 3.56 .325 2.22 0.85, 5.83 .106
 Dentists 0.68 0.48, 0.95 .026* 0.89 0.61, 1.29 .528 0.80 0.53, 1.21 .297 0.83 0.53, 1.30 .425
LAY INDIVIDUALS 0.75 0.56, 1.01 .056 0.84 0.62, 1.14 .260 1.24 0.90, 1.71 .199 1.32 0.94, 1.85 .105
 Friends 0.71 0.42, 1.18 .188 0.77 0.44, 1.33 .343 1.06 0.73, 1.54 .741 1.16 0.78, 1.72 .471
 Family 0.56 0.31, 1.02 .059 0.68 0.36, 1.27 .221 1.21 0.79, 1.86 .382 1.31 0.83, 2.06 .249
 Religious organizations and leaders 0.72 0.52, 1.00 .049* 0.79 0.56, 1.11 .172 1.66 0.96, 2.88 .070 1.83 0.97, 3.43 .061
HEALTH AUTHORITIES 0.83 0.63, 1.09 .171 1.00 0.75, 1.34 .983 1.05 0.65, 1.69 .850 1.32 0.80, 2.20 .279
 Health fairs 0.83 0.59, 1.17 .283 0.98 0.68, 1.40 .892 1.70 0.98, 2.95 .060 1.91 1.03, 3.53 .039*
 Local health department 1.06 0.72, 1.55 .767 1.05 0.70, 1.57 .813 1.42 0.97, 2.09 .073 1.38 0.91, 2.10 .129
 Federal government organizations 0.63 0.44, 0.90 .011* 0.72 0.49, 1.07 .101 0.85 0.58, 1.24 .396 0.91 0.60, 1.37 .649
 Scientists 0.70 0.50, 0.96 .028* 0.75 0.53, 1.06 .103 0.72 0.47, 1.10 .121 0.86 0.54, 1.35 .506
 Scientific literature 0.82 0.59, 1.15 .245 1.03 0.71, 1.48 .879 0.90 0.62, 1.32 .595 1.06 0.70, 1.60 .796
ONLINE SOURCES 0.67 0.45, 1.00 .047* 0.87 0.57, 1.32 .506 0.89 0.71, 1.11 .302 0.95 0.75, 1.20 .660
 Search engines 0.74 0.42, 1.31 .302 0.90 0.49, 1.65 .731 0.66 0.45, 0.97 .036* 0.74 0.49, 1.11 .144
 Social media 0.71 0.48, 1.03 .074 0.86 0.57, 1.29 .456 0.67 0.44, 1.01 .055 0.70 0.45, 1.09 .111
 Medical websites 0.68 0.41, 1.14 .142 0.83 0.47, 1.44 .502 0.86 0.57, 1.31 .489 0.94 0.61, 1.46 .792
 Blogs or celebrity webpages 0.67 0.47, 0.96 .030* 0.81 0.55, 1.20 .303 0.96 0.54, 1.69 .875 1.19 0.64, 2.22 .585
MASS MEDIA 0.63 0.41, 0.97 .034* 0.87 0.55, 1.37 .542 1.05 0.69, 1.60 .813 1.20 0.78, 1.86 .413
 Newspapers 0.72 0.50, 1.02 .064 0.85 0.58, 1.24 .391 0.85 0.56, 1.27 .422 0.90 0.58, 1.40 .637
 Magazines 0.65 0.45, 0.92 .016* 0.77 0.53, 1.13 .185 1.01 0.70, 1.47 .951 1.14 0.77, 1.71 .513
 Books 0.72 0.50, 1.03 .075 0.88 0.59, 1.31 .529 1.52 1.05, 2.18 .025* 1.66 1.13, 2.45 .011*
 Television 0.73 0.50, 1.07 .107 0.84 0.56, 1.25 .381 1.03 0.72, 1.47 .866 1.21 0.83, 1.79 .324
 Radio 0.67 0.47, 0.95 .025* 0.81 0.27, 1.18 .273 0.84 0.53, 1.34 .466 1.01 0.61, 1.67 .960
COMPANIES 0.79 0.54, 1.17 .243 0.90 0.59, 1.36 .613 1.58 0.71, 3.51 .265 1.72 0.76, 3.90 .196
 Pharmaceutical companies 0.82 0.60, 1.14 .241 0.90 0.64, 1.27 .536 1.13 0.75, 1.71 .564 1.19 0.77, 1.86 .431
 Other companies or corporations 0.88 0.64, 1.22 .452 0.92 0.65, 1.31 .652 1.90 1.04, 3.48 .038* 1.82 0.95, 3.48 .070

Note. Results were weighted using the rural-urban specific weight; OR = odds ratio; SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval;

*

indicates P < .05;

**

indicates P < .01.

For Access, unadjusted models contained the single predictor (rural versus urban); adjusted models included race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other), income (continuous), and education (continuous) as covariates; For Use, unadjusted models contained Access as a covariate; adjusted models included Access, race/ethnicity, income, and education as covariates.