Skip to main content
. 2019 May 17;4:16. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0049-6

Table 1.

Overview of the reported efficacy data from prospective and retrospective clinical trials of pazopanib monotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma

Study Prospective Retrospective
Sleifjer (2009)18 Van der Graaf (2012)6 Frezza (2014)72 Benson (2016)26 Samuels (2017)28 Martin-Broto (2019)45 Maruzzo (2015)43 Stacchiotti (2018)73 Frezza (2018)74 Gelderblom (2017)27 Jones (2017)75 Kollar (2016)76 Menegaz (2017)77 Nakamura (2016)78 Nakano (2015)79 Stacchiotti (2014)44 Yoo (2015)80
Design Non-comparative phase II Double blind, placebo-controlled, phase III Subgroups from phII and III trials + EAP data Subgroups from phII and III trials Single arm, multicentre US phase II Single arm, multicentre European phase II Single centre case series Int’l multicentre case series Int’l multicentre case series Intl’ multicentre case series based on EAP Int’l case series European multicentre case series, inc phase II/III UK centre case series Japanese multicentre case series Japanese centre case series Italian multicentre series Korean centre series
N 142 369 9 44 41 36 13 30 18 211 8 52 29 156 47 6 43
Subtypes LMS, SS, LPS, ‘Other’ Mixed (LPS excluded DSRCT Uterine sarcoma (89 % LMS) LPS (int/high grade) SFT SFT ASPS Epithelioid sarcoma Mixed Chondro-sarcoma Vascular sarcomas DSRCT Mixed Mixed SFT Mixed
Eligibility <3 prior lines 1–3 prev lines ≥2nd line ≥2nd line Any line Any line 1st line Any line Any line 1–3 prev lines Any line Any line Any line Any line Any line Any line ≥2nd line

Best response:

CR or PR

6% 6% 22% 11% 2% 6% 8% 27% 0% 7% 0% 23% 7% 8% 11% 0% 16%
SD NR 67% 56% 57% 42% 60% 62% 57% 50% 18% 75% 21% 55% 47% NR 50% 42%
PrD NR 24% 22% 32% 66% 34% 15% 13% 50% 41% 25% 50% 38% 24% NR 50% 37%
12wPFR LMS:44% SS:49% LPS:26% Other:39% 60%a 67% 50% 68% NR 62% 59% 50% 50% 75% AS:45%a EHE:60%a 62% 60%a 60%a 50%a NR
Median PFS (months) LMS:3.0 SS:5.4 LPS:2.7 Other:3.0 4.6 (vs. 1.6 in placebo arm) 9.2 3 4.4 5.6 4.7 13.6 3 3 NA AS: 3.0 EHE: 26.3 5.6 3.6 4.3 3 5
Median OS (months) LMS:11.8 SS:10.3 LPS:6.6 Other:10.0 12.5 (vs. 10.7 in placebo arm) 15.4 17.5 12.6 Not reached 13.3 Not reached 14 11.1 NR AS: 9.9 EHE 26.3 15.7 11.2 9.6 NR 8.2
Comments Favorable PFS and OS vs. historical control in LMS, SS and Other subgroups - Drug licensed in pre-treated non-adipocytic STS based on evidence of PFS benefit In PALETTE trial, significantly longer PFS and OS with pazopanib vs. placebo LPS subtypes: 66% DDLPS, 29% MLPS, 5% PleoLPS Response by Choi criteria: 51% PR 26% SD 23% PrD Median follow-up 19 months Authors conclude limited activity in ES 5/8 Convent-ional CS 1/8 ESMC 1/8 MC 1/8 clear cell Equivalent ORR in cutaneous vs. non-cutaneous or 1° vs. 2° AS NB 33/156 (21%) LPS Trend toward better PFS in PALETTE eligible subtypes (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25–1.23, p = 0.15)

CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PrD progressive disease, 12wPFR 12 week progression-free rate, PFS progression-free survival, OS overall survival, LMS leiomyosarcoma, SS synovial sarcoma, LPS liposarcoma, DSRCT desmoplastic small round cell tumor, SFT solitary fibrous tumor, AS angiosarcoma, EHE epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, DDLPS dedifferentiated liposarcoma, MLPS myxoid liposarcoma, PleoLPS pleomorphic liposarcoma, ES epithelioid sarcoma, CS chondrosarcoma, ESMC extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, MC mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, ASPS alveolar soft part sarcoma

aApproximate