Table 5.
Scenario analysis results for 1 million Japanese adults
| Age | Payer’s perspective | Societal perspective | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incremental cost (¥) | Incremental QALY | ICER (¥/QALY) | Incremental cost (¥) | Incremental QALY | ICER (¥/QALY) | ||
| Base case | ≥ 65 | 9,988,336,455 | 2314 | 4,316,457 | 9,339,400,259 | 2314 | 4,036,020 |
| Scenario 1 | ≥ 50 | 9,838,441,491 | 2177 | 4,518,465 | 9,024,002,320 | 2177 | 4,144,421 |
| Scenario 2 | ≥ 60 | 9,920,792,661 | 2288 | 4,336,202 | 9,230,655,772 | 2288 | 4,034,556 |
| Scenario 3 | ≥ 70 | 10,123,202,685 | 2314 | 4,374,192 | 9,529,813,540 | 2314 | 4,117,791 |
ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY quality-adjusted life years