Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;5(5):e01577. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01577

Table 3.

Evaluation of metal/metal oxide based titania nanocomposites for the removal of arsenic.

Materials Particle Size (nm) Surface Area (m2/g) pH Adsorption capacity (mg/g) Forms of arsenic References
m- TiO2-αFe2O3 26.7 95 3.0
7.0
80%
99%
As(III)
As(V)
[67]
TiO2-Fe2O3 bi-composite 20 μm 133.5 5.0
7.0
9.0
12.4
7.79
6.48
As(V) [68]
Fe-TNTs 8–11 162.8 2.5 80.67
36.41
As(V) [69]
NHITO 7.0–11 77.8 7.0
7.0
85
14.3
As(III)
As(V)
[70]
RGO-MFT 20–45 275.23 6.0
7.0
77.6
99.5
As(V)
As (III)
[71]
FTSZ 61 nm 189.2 7.0 As (III) [72]
Ce-Ti oxide 100–200 nm 38.2–68.8 6.5
6.5
6.8
7.5
As (III)
As (V)
[78]
Zr-Ti oxide …… 114 9.0
3.0
28.6 As(III)
As (V)
[80]
Ti-BYC 10–30 nm 82 7.0 348.5 As(V) [82]

Abbreviations: TNTs, titania nanotubes; NHITO; Iron (III) titanium (IV) mixed binary oxide; RGO-MFT, reduced graphene oxide/magnetite iron-titania ternary; FTSZ, iron, titania/silica modified with zinc.