Table A5.

Results from high resolution algorithm.

Sample	Data	Counts/$\mathbf{kpcs}$	${\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{vol}}/\%$	${\mathit{C}}_{\mathit{num}}/{\mathbf{mL}}^{-1}$	$\overline{\mathit{Z}}$	$\mathit{D}\left(\mathit{i}\right)$	$\mathit{D}\left(\mathit{v}\right)$	$\mathit{D}\left(\mathit{n}\right)$	$\mathit{Peak}\left(\mathit{vol}\right)$	$\mathit{PdI}$
Au10	good	$921$	$1.61·{10}^{-4}$	$5.17·{10}^{12}$	$21$	$13$	$11$	$10$	$11$	$0.39$
Au30	good	$\mathrm{37,222}$	$2.00·{10}^{-4}$	$1.88·{10}^{11}$	$34$	$39$	$32$	$28$	$33$	$0.23$
Au100	good	$\mathrm{1,591,815}$	$3.65·{10}^{-4}$	$8.47·{10}^9$	$106$	$105$	$95$	$77$	$73$	$0.12$
Au250	bad	$\mathrm{181,640}$	$1.66·{10}^{-4}$	$3.49·{10}^8$	$237$	$216$	$232$	$208$	$241$	$0.18$