Table 5.

Decreased lead (Pb) levels after 90 days of supplementation as compared with baseline levels.

Ba	Median	25%	75%	H
Control	0.17	0.1	0.33	H = 7.73, p = 0.021.
d0	0.54	0.25	0.84 *	MW (* d0 vs. control, p = 0.05).
d90	0.28	0.2	0.36	MW (d90 vs. control, p = 0.11, n.s).
Pb	Median	25%	75%	H
Control	0.11	0.07	0.3	H = 3.41, p = 0.18, n.s.
d0	0.14	0.09	0.21
d90	0.085	0.05	0.14 #	MW (# d90 vs. d0, p = 0.047).
Cd	Median	25%	75%	H
Control	0.009	0.009	0.010	H = 4.73, p = 0.094, n.s.
d0	0.009	0.009	0.009
d90	0.009	0.009	0.009	MW (d90 vs. control, p = 0.08, n.s).
Sb	Median	25%	75%	H
Control	0.01	0.01	0.018	H = 3.5, p = 0.16, n.s.
d0	0.01	0.01	0.01
d90	0.01	0.01	0.01
As	Median	25%	75%	H
Control	0.038	0.01	0.018	H = 0.9, p = 0.62, n.s.
d0	0.028	0.022	0.042
d90	0.028	0.023	0.052
	* p < 0.05 vs. Cont		# p < 0.05 d90 vs. d0

These tables show percentile values (median, 25%, and 75%) in Kruskal Wallis analysis for several heavy metals/oligoelements (Hg⁺⁺, Ag, Sn, Zn⁺⁺, Cu⁺⁺, Al, Cr, V, Co, and Ni), metabolic oligoelements (Se, Mo, Mn⁺⁺, Li, Ge, S, P, I, Ca⁺⁺, Sr, B, Na⁺, K⁺, Mg⁺⁺, Rb, B, and Fe⁺⁺), and metals of environmental exposure in Table 6 (Ba, As, Pt, Sb, Tl, To, Cd, Be, Bi, Zr, Pb, Cd, As, and U). The ANOVA data for V are shown by mean values ± S.E.M [the root square divided by n; n was the size sample; n = 16 (d90), n = 16 (d0), n = 21 controls]. Post hoc differences were evaluated by the Mann Whitney or Dunn’s method; Control: controls without dental materials and non-supplemented (n = 21); d0: patients with long-term titanium implants and dental amalgam fillings restorations (d0, n = 16); d90: patients with long-term titanium implants and dental amalgams after 90 days of supplementation (n = 16); n.s: not significant effect, p > 0.05). * p < 0.05 vs. Control; # p < 0.05 d90 vs. d0).