Table 2.
Author | Sample | Study Design | Exercise Temporality | Exercise Protocol | Memory Assessment | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stones et al. (1993) [62] | 20 older adults, Mage = 84.5 |
Experimental; between-subject | Memory battered occurred before exercise, immediately after exercise and then 30-min post-exercise | 15-min exercises, which occurred while sitting in a chair (e.g., stretching, low-intensity aerobic activity, slow rhythmical movement) | Word fluency | Exercise was associated with greater semantically cued memory (p < 0.01). |
Schramke et al. (1997) [63] | Two age groups, each including 48 adults. Younger group, 18–38 year. Older group, 60–80 year. | Experimental; within-subject | Exercise occurred either at rest or during encoding, and similarly, either during retrieval or not. | 5–7 minutes of walking in a long internal corridor. | CVLT; California verbal learning test | There was no difference in learning that was due to initial exercise condition, but both age groups showed greater recall when state was congruent before learning and delayed recall. |
Labban et al. (2011) [6] | 48 young adults (Mage = 22.0) | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurred before and after encoding | 30-min of cycle ergometer exercise, with 20-min at moderate-intensity | Paragraph recall, with participants listening to two paragraphs and then recalling as much information as possible from the paragraphs | Exercise occurring prior to the memory task was effective in enhancing memory (p < 0.05). |
Salas et al. (2011) [64] | 80 college undergraduate students (46 women). Mage = 19.3, SD = 2.3 | Experimental; between-subject factorial design. A 2 (encoding condition: walking vs. sitting) × 2 (retrieval condition: walking vs. sitting). | Exercise occurred either at rest or during encoding, and similarly, either during retrieval or not. | 10 minutes of walking outside at a brisk pace | Word-list memory task (10 nouns presented sequentially for 6 s each) | Students who walked before encoding had significantly higher recall (M = 0.45, SD = 0.17) compared to students who sat before encoding (M = 0.36, SD = 0.15), F(1,76) = 6.34, ƞ2p = 0.08. |
Nanda et al. (2013) [65] | 10 healthy adult male medical students. Mage = 19.5, SD = 0.9 | Quasi-experimental; within-subject | Exercise occurred between pre- and post- memory assessments. | Cycle ergometer exercise for 30-min at moderate-intensity of 70% of heart rate reserve | Spatial span and paired associates memory task | Spatial span did not increase from pre- to post, but paired associates was significantly higher after the exercise bout. |
Schmidt-Kassow et al. (2014) [10] | 49 right-handed German young adults (18–30 year) | Experimental; within-subject | Exercised during encoding | Self-selected walking pace during memory encoding | 40-item (Polish) word list. | Experiment 1: words recalled during walking was higher than non-walking (5.5, SD = 3.3; vs. 4.8, SD = 4.2), F = 6.98, p = 0.02, ƞ2p = 0.31. Experiment 2: words recalled during walking was higher than non-walking (5.3, SD = 4.6; vs. 4.1, SD = 3.5), F = 6.44, p = 0.02, ƞ2p = 0.19. |
Weinberg et al. (2014) [66] | 23 participants (Mage = 20.6 year) in the exercise group and 23 (Mage = 20.2 year) in the control group. | Experimental; between-subject | Exercised during early consolidation | Isokinetic dynamometer knee extension exercise. Session consisted of submaximal voluntary dynamic contractions for a warm-up, maximal voluntary isometric contractions, and 6 sets of 10 repetitions of maximal voluntary knee extension contractions. Both legs were exercised. In the control (passive) group, the experimenter passively moved the participant leg between extension and flexion. | 180 images from the IAPS. Follow-up memory recall assessment took place 48-h later. The retrieval task included 90 studied images and 90 new images. Participants were instructed to indicate “remember”, “familiar”, or “new” after seeing each image. | There was no valence × group interaction effect. There was a main effect for valence in that participants remembered more positive and negative images than neutral images. |
Basso et al. (2015) [67] | 85 young adults, Mage = 22.1 | Experimental; between-subject | Memory tasks occurred before exercise and at various time-points after exercise (30–120 min) | 50-min of vigorous-intensity exercise on cycle ergometer | Hopkins verbal learning test revised, modified Benton visual retention test, Digit span | Acute exercise improved prefrontal-cortex, but not hippocampal-dependent memory function. |
Loprinzi et al. (2015) [68] | 87 young adults, Mage = 21.4 year | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise before memory task | Light, moderate, and vigorous exercise | Spatial span and paired associates | Acute exercise was not associated with either memory outcome. |
Bantoft et al. (2016) [69] | 45 undergraduate students, Mage = 22.6 year (6.2) | Experimental; within-subject | Sitting, standing or walking during memory task | Low-intensity walking | Digit span | There were no differences in memory performance across the three conditions. |
van Dongen et al. (2016) [19] | 72 young adults, approximately 22 years | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise immediately after encoding and 4 hours after encoding | 35 min of intermittent high-intensity exercise on cycle ergometer | Paired associates learning task | Exercising 4 hours after memory encoding was advantageous in improving memory function. |
Crush et al. (2017) [70] | 352 participants, mean age approximately 21 years | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurring before memory assessment | 16 total groups, with groups ranging from 10 min of exercise to 60 min of exercise, including resting periods of either 5, 15, or 30 min | Spatial span | Shorter exercise recovery periods had a greater effect on memory performance. |
Frith et al. (2017) [31] | 88 participants (22 per group), approximate age = 21 years. | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurring before, during, and after memory encoding | 15-min treadmill bout of progressive high-intensity aerobic exercise | RAVLT | High-intensity exercise prior to memory encoding was effective in enhancing long-term memory, for both 20-min delay (F = 3.36, p = 0.02, ƞ2p = 0.11) and 24-h delay (F =2.80, p = 0.04, ƞ2p = 0.09). |
Keyan et al. (2017) [71] | 49 undergraduates between 18–29 years | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurred during the early memory consolidation period | Stepping exercise for 10-min on a 15 cm stepper, with a goal of exercising at 50%–85% of max. | Viewed a film depicting a car accident. Involves 10 min of live footage depicting emergency workers attending the scene of a motor vehicle accident. | Exercise (vs. control) did not induce more recall of central (t = 0.11, p > 0.05) or peripheral (t = 0.42, p > 0.05) details of the accident film. However, those that exercise recalled more intrusive memories of the car accident (t = 2.36, p = 0.02, d = 0.68). |
Keyan et al. (2017) [72] | 54 healthy undergraduate students, Mage = 19.5 (3.0) | Experimental; between-subject | During a memory reconsolidation paradigm, participants either exercised or did not exercise after memory reactivation | 20–25 min of incremental cycling | Trauma film depicting the aftermath of a highway car crash | The exercise with reactivation condition recalled more central details of the trauma film. |
McNerney et al. (2017) [73] | Experiment 1: 136 young adults, Mage = 19.2 (1.2) Experiment 2: 132 young adults, Mage = 19.1 (1.2) |
Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurring before and after memory encoding | 2-min of sprints | Paired associate learning, procedural learning, and text memory | Improvements in procedural and situation model memory occurred, regardless of whether exercise occurred before or after memory encoding. |
Most et al. (2017) [74] | Experiment 1: 82 undergraduate psychology students (Mage = 19.9). Experiment 2: 83 undergraduate psychology students (Mage = 19.9). Experiment 3: 48 undergraduate psychology students (Mage = 19.2). Experiment 4: 75 undergraduate psychology students (Mage = 21.1). | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurring after memory encoding | 5-min of step exercise | Paired faces and names. | Acute exercise in the early consolidation period enhanced memory. |
Sng et al. (2017) [32] | 88 participants, approximately 21–25 years (mean for each group) | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurred before, during and immediately after memory encoding | 15-min moderate intensity brisk walking (self-selected) | RAVLT | Exercising before memory encoding was superior for enhancing learning (p = 0.05), 24-h memory recognition (p = 0.05) and 24-h memory attribution (p = 0.006). |
Delancey et al. (2018) [40] | 40 participants, approximately 20 years of age | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurring 4 hours after memory encoding | High-intensity bout of exercise for 15 minutes | RAVLT | Those who exercise during the consolidation period have a greater 24-h follow-up memory attribution (p = 0.04). |
Haynes et al. (2018) [33] | 24 participants (Mage = 20.9; SD = 1.9), with 66.7% being female. | Experimental; within-subject | Exercise occurring before, during, and after memory encoding | Self-selected brisk walking pace for 15-min | RAVLT | Short-term memory was greater in the visit that involved exercise prior to the memory task (F= 3.76, p = 0.01, ƞ2p = 0.79). Similar results occurred for long-term memory, but there were no exercise effects on prospective memory. |
Labban et al. (2018) [75] | 15 Participants; Mage = 22.7, SD = 3.1 | Experimental; within-subject | Exercise occurring both before and after memory encoding. | 30-min of moderate intensity cycling | RAVLT | Exercise that occurred before encoding (vs. control) was advantageous in enhancing long-term memory, including both 60-min delayed memory (p = 0.03) and 24-h delayed recall (p = 0.03). |
Siddiqui et al. (2018) [76] | 20 participants (60% male). Mage = 21.1; SD = 1.0 | Experimental; within-subject | Exercise occurring both before and during memory encoding. | 20-min treadmill walk at a self-selected brisk walking pace | The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Included a 15-item word list. | For both short-term and long-term memory, the visit the involved exercise before the memory task resulted in the greatest memory performance (F = 11.56, p < 0.001, ƞ2p = 0.38) |
Wade et al. (2018) [77] | 34 female participants; Mage = 20.5 (1.2) in the exercise group and 20.8 (1.8) in the control group. | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurred before memory encoding | 15-min treadmill walk at a self-selected brisk walking pace | Emotional memory assessment using images from the IAPS (International Affective Picture System). | There were no statistically significant group differences across any of the assessment periods (i.e., 1-day, 7-day, and 14-day follow-up assessments). |
Yanes et al. (2018) [78] | 40 participants, Mage = 21.0 | Experimental; between-subject | Exercise occurred before memory encoding | 15-min treadmill walk at a self-selected brisk walking pace | 6-paragraph passage for memory recall | Exercise before encoding had greater scores on the short-term and long-term memory assessments, but this did not reach statistical significance (F = 1.0, p = 0.32, ƞ2p = 0.03). |
Zuniga et al. (2018) [79] | Experiment 1 (N = 30), Mage = 20.4 (1.8); Experiment 2 (N = 57), Mage = 20.6 (4.1) in low-fit group and Mage = 19.4 (1.6) in high-fit group. | Experimental; within-subject | Exercise occurred before memory encoding | 3-min warm-up period on the treadmill, followed by 10-min of walking at either light or moderate-intensity. | Three lists of 30 concrete English nouns from the MRC Psycholinguistic database. | Both light-intensity (t = 2.79, p = 0.01) and moderate-intensity (t = 3.02, p = 0.006) recalled more words than the sedentary condition. Results were similar when comparing high-fit to low-fit individuals. |
CVLT; California verbal learning test; IAPS, International Affective Picture System; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task.