Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;6:61. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00061

Table 3.

Analyses testing potential differences in the base-case scenarios.

Scenario rECG
cost
rECG
QALY
spECG
cost
spECG
QALY
ICER for spECG vs. rECG
Base case 65,497 7.232 65,048 7.240 Dominant
SSI rate: 2.5% after 90 days 64,543 7.249 64,339 7.253 Dominant
DSWI accounts for 0% of SSIs 64,580 7.244 64,367 7.249 Dominant
SSI: 2.5% and no DSWI 64,124 7.255 64,028 7.257 Dominant
2% of CABG patients require pMV 65,034 7.235 64,588 7.243 Dominant
Population: age 60 and 10% diabetes 75,982 10.167 75,567 10.175 Dominant
rECG at $4 per use 65,030 7.235 64,588 7.243 Dominant
spECG at $30 per use 65,034 7.235 64,618 7.243 Dominant

CABG, Coronary artery bypass graft; Dominant, Lower cost and higher QALYs; DSWI, Deep sternal wound infection; ECG, Electrocardiogram; pMV, Prolonged mechanical ventilation; QALY, Quality-adjusted life years; rECG, Reusable ECG; spECG, Single-patient-use ECG; SSI, Surgical site infection; vs, versus.