Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;11(4):167. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11040167

Table 4.

Comparison of skin permeation of HQ formulations (F) across synthetic (S.M. for Strat-M®) or natural (M.S. for Mouse skin) membranes. Key: Jss, steady-state transdermal flux calculated from the slope of the Cartesian plot of the cumulative amount of the drug present in the receptor compartment versus time; ER, enhancement ratio, calculated as the ratio of steady-state transdermal flux from each formulation compared to formulation 1; P, permeability coefficient calculated by using formula Jss/cd (cd is the amount of drug applied in the donor compartment, so 200 mg of formulation is equivalent to 10 mg of HQ); D, diffusion coefficient (cm2/h) calculated by using formula Jss = d.k/h × cd (where h is the thickness of the Strat-M® or mouse skin); NA, not applicable.

F Membrane Jss (µg/cm2/h) Lag time (h) P (cm/h) × 102 D (cm2/h) × 103 ER Amount of HQ in the Skin (mg/g)
F1 S.M. 49.3 ± 2.4 0.95 ± 0.06 0.49 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.03 - NA
F2 S.M. 39.3 ± 3.9 1.18 ± 0.09 0.39 ± 0.03 0.43 ± 0.04 0.8 ± 0.1 NA
F3 S.M. 106.3 ± 6.5 0.47 ± 0.08 1.06 ± 0.08 1.17 ± 0.09 2.2 ± 0.2 NA
F4 S.M. 78.1 ± 3.3 0.79 ± 0.07 0.78 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.03 1.6 ± 0.1 NA
F1 M.S. 309.9 ± 66.3 0.35 ± 0.08 3.09 ± 0.66 4.31 ± 0.92 - 3.58 ± 1.21
F2 M.S. 221.5 ± 43.1 0.42 ± 0.08 2.21 ± 0.42 3.10 ± 0.06 0.7 ± 0.1 2.50 ± 1.43
F3 M.S. 1754.1 ± 184.9 0.12 ± 0.06 17.5 ± 1.82 24.5 ± 2.58 5.7 ± 0.6 1.36 ± 0.84
F4 M.S. 700.5 ± 213.0 0.12 ± 0.03 7.00 ± 0.21 9.81 ± 0.25 2.3 ± 0.7 1.57 ± 0.78