Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 23;8(4):369. doi: 10.3390/cells8040369

Table 1.

Stability levels of candidate RGs.

Gene name GeNorm
M-Value
NormFinder
Stability
BestKeeper
SD ± CP
ΔCt
Mean
Mean
Crt
GeoMean
miR-26a-5p 0.228 (1) 0.079 (2) 0.626 (4) 0.536 (1) 13.81 (2) 1.7
miR-16-5p 0.228 (1) 0.060 (1) 0.683 (5) 0.562 (2) 15.09 (5) 2.2
221-3p 0.313 (3) 0.282 (4) 0.571 (3) 0.648 (3) 13.94 (3) 3.2
U6 snRNA 0.414 (4) 0.423 (7) 0.401 (2) 0.757 (7) 12.53 (1) 3.3
let-7a-5p 0.497 (6) 0.240 (3) 0.773 (6) 0.663 (4) 14.61 (4) 4.4
miR-423-5p 0.439 (5) 0.511 (8) 0.368 (1) 0.834 (8) 19.15 (9) 4.9
miR-23a-3p 0.548 (7) 0.336 (6) 0.926 (8) 0.716 (6) 17.72 (6) 6.6
miR-101-3p 0.583 (8) 0.323 (5) 0.926 (7) 0.702 (5) 22.33 (10) 6.7
miR-103a-3p 0.674 (9) 0.622 (10) 1.332 (10) 0.997 (9) 17.87 (7) 8.9
miR-425-5p 0.741 (10) 0.620 (9) 1.177 (9) 1.026 (10) 17.88 (8) 9.2

miRNAs were ranked according to gene stability as determined by geomean. The numbers in brackets represent the ranking values, regarded as a recommended final ranking.