Table 8.
By site - Cost-effectiveness of SHHC. ICERs (vs Status Quo) from the societal perspective
| Site ID | Weight loss | BMI reduction | CRP reduction | Simple 7 increase | ASCVD QALY saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 683 | 1823 | *224,455 | 8392 | 414,770 |
| 5 | 408 | 1028 | 1153 | 1762 | 1,290,021 |
| 6 | *1692 | *5099 | 983 | 2732 | 184,905 |
| 8 | 681 | 1892 | 1827 | 1827 | 430,353 |
| 11 | 436 | 1729 | 945 | 5012 | 63,429 |
| 12 | 2291 | 5547 | 1214 | 1068 | 1,264,574 |
| 14 | 719 | 1854 | 1055 | 983 | 56,118 |
| 16 | 790 | 2022 | 1560 | 2342 | *3,674,482 |
The “*” implies that the effect is in the unexpected direction. For example, an ICER for weight loss with “*” implies that on average participants gained instead of lost body weight after the SHHC