Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;10:1074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01074

Table 1.

Groups’ characteristics for body mass index, age, country of birth, relationship status, educational level, Centrality of Religiosity Scale scores, and media consumption (N = 230).

Variable Possible range Muslim women (n = 66)
Christian women (n = 90)
Atheist women (n = 74)
Group comparison
M SD M SD M SD F df P ηp2
Body mass index 24.05a,b 4.43 21.65c 3.51 21.68c 2.49 10.752∗∗ 2 <0.001 0.09
Age 22.11 4.05 21.29 3.07 21.73 3.97 0.840 2 0.433 0.01
Number of participants
Born in Germany 52 (78.8%)a,b 89 (98.9%)c 71 (96.0%)c χ2 = 23.046∗∗ <0.001 0.10
Being in a current relationship 15 (22.7%)a,b 46 (51.1%)c 35 (47.3%)c χ2 = 14.521 0.001 0.06
With university degree 7 (10.4%) 7 (7.8%) 6 (8.1%) χ2 = 0.388 0.824 0.00
Centrality of Religiosity Scale 1–5 4.42a,b 0.40 2.64b,c 0.68 1.68a,c 0.39 497.291∗∗ 2 <0.001 0.81
Media Consumption
TV- and video-viewing hours 1–7 2.57 1.57 2.38 1.34 2.50 1.50 0.317 2 0.729 0.00
Reading of dieting articles 1–4 1.80 0.77 2.00 0.72 1.85 0.68 1.630 2 0.198 0.01

∗∗p < 0.001; p < 0.05. aDiffer significantly from Christian women (p < 0.05). bDiffer significantly from atheist women (p < 0.05). cDiffer significantly from Muslim women (p < 0.05).