Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 8;74(6):1531–1538. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz035

Table 2.

Total number of animal samples (S) and number of ESBL-positive samples (E) grouped by exposure to individual animal treatment 2 months prior to sampling, excluding exposure due to colostrum feeding of calves, for five selected Dutch conventional dairy cattle farms, for which detailed AMU data were available, during 2014–15

    No antimicrobial
Only first-choice antimicrobial
First- and second-choice antimicrobial
Farm Sample S E S E S E
4 Group 1 40 2 0 0 0 0
  Group 2 88 1 0 0 0 0
  Group 3 80 2 1 0 0 0
  Group 4 89 2 2 0 3 1
  Total 1–4 297 7 3 0 3 1
5 Group 1 53 1 0 0 0 0
  Group 2 141 0 1 0 0 0
  Group 3 111 0 2 0 0 0
  Group 4 97 2 0 0 0 0
  Total 1–4 402 3 3 0 0 0
14 Group 1 58 0 0 0 0 0
  Group 2 119 1 0 0 0 0
  Group 3 74 0 0 0 0 0
  Group 4 207 56 1 1 0 0
  Total 1–4 458 57 1 1 0 0
15 Group 1 26 20 0 0 0 0
  Group 2 127 37 0 0 0 0
  Group 3 142 43 0 0 0 0
  Group 4 205 96 3 3 0 0
  Total 1–4 500 196 3 3 0 0
19 Group 1 41 9 0 0 0 0
  Group 2 136 16 0 0 0 0
  Group 3 140 27 0 0 0 0
  Group 4 169 46 2 1 1 1
  Total 1–4 486 98 2 1 1 1