Methods | A randomised, double‐blind, 24‐week, multi‐centre study at 124 centres in France; 8‐week open run‐in on SFC (50/250 μg twice daily) | |
Participants |
Population: 308 adults (18+ years) with asthma controlled on ICS
(1000 μg CFC beclomethasone equivalent daily) and LABA Baseline characteristics: mean age 44 years; FEV₁ 90% predicted Concomitant ICS used by 100% of participants Inclusion criteria: currently receiving ICS at a dose of 1000 μg daily of inhaled BDP or equivalent and LABA. Asthma controlled on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks were entered into run‐in, and then entered into the full study if asthma was well controlled (as defined in GOAL) in last 2 weeks of 8‐week run‐in on fluticasone propionate/salmeterol Exclusion criteria: excluded from entry into the run‐in period if smoking history of ≥ 10 pack‐years, respiratory tract infection during last 4 weeks before initial clinic visit (V1), acute asthma exacerbation requiring emergency room treatment or hospitalisation within 4 weeks before V1, use of oral/parenteral corticosteroids during last 4 weeks before V1 (12 weeks for depot corticosteroids), any change in asthma maintenance treatment in previous 4 weeks |
|
Interventions | • Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 250/50 μg twice daily • Fluticasone 250 μg twice daily • Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 100/50 μg twice daily (not analysed in this review) Delivery device Diskus |
|
Outcomes | Primary efficacy endpoint: variation in mean morning PEF over first 12 weeks of the treatment period compared to last 2 weeks of the run‐in period (baseline) | |
Notes | Sponsored by GSK | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Double‐blind randomised 24‐week study" |
Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events | High risk | Causation of SAEs not independently assessed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Uneven withdrawals (18/159 on fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and 30/159 on fluticasone) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Full SAE data reported in paper |