Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;2018(12):CD006922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006922.pub4
Methods A parallel‐group, multi‐centre study over 12 weeks
Participants 365 adults and adolescents randomised Age range: 12 to 82 years; mean FEV₁ 68% predicted
Inclusion criteria: fluticasone propionate 440 to 660 μg/d for ≥ 3 months before study entry; FEV₁ 40% to 85%; reversibility ≥ 15%
Interventions Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol HFA 110/42 twice daily (220/84) vs CFC salmeterol 42 twice daily (84) vs CFC fluticasone 110 twice daily (220) vs HFA placebo Inhaler devices: MDI
Run‐in: 2 weeks This review includes only data from the fluticasone propionate and salmeterol and fluticasone arms Co‐interventions: ICS at usual dose was an inclusion criterion, but it appears to have been withdrawn in the salmeterol and placebo arms of the study
Outcomes The paper publication mentions 1 drug‐related SAE (an upper gastrointestinal bleed from the placebo group) Website: SAS30004
No fatal SAE. No SAE on fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate
Notes Sponsored by GSK
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events High risk Causation of SAEs not independently assessed
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk 243/365 (67%) completed the study; no SAEs occurred
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Full data on GSK website