Methods | A parallel‐group, multi‐centre study over 12 weeks | |
Participants | 365 adults and adolescents randomised Age range: 12 to
82 years; mean FEV₁ 68% predicted Inclusion criteria: fluticasone propionate 440 to 660 μg/d for ≥ 3 months before study entry; FEV₁ 40% to 85%; reversibility ≥ 15% |
|
Interventions | Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol HFA 110/42 twice daily (220/84) vs
CFC salmeterol 42 twice daily (84) vs CFC fluticasone 110 twice daily (220)
vs HFA placebo Inhaler devices: MDI Run‐in: 2 weeks This review includes only data from the fluticasone propionate and salmeterol and fluticasone arms Co‐interventions: ICS at usual dose was an inclusion criterion, but it appears to have been withdrawn in the salmeterol and placebo arms of the study |
|
Outcomes | The paper publication mentions 1 drug‐related SAE (an upper
gastrointestinal bleed from the placebo group) Website:
SAS30004 No fatal SAE. No SAE on fluticasone propionate/salmeterol or fluticasone propionate |
|
Notes | Sponsored by GSK | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind |
Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events | High risk | Causation of SAEs not independently assessed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 243/365 (67%) completed the study; no SAEs occurred |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Full data on GSK website |