| Methods | A multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blind,
parallel‐group comparison of the efficacy of SERETIDE* twice
daily and fluticasone propionate twice daily (both via
Diskus*/ACCUHALER*, Inhaler) when tapering the inhaled
corticosteroid dose in asthmatic adults Carried out over 26 weeks from May 2000 to July 2001, at 34 centres in 10 countries (Australia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Latvia, New Zealand, Spain, United Kingdom) |
|
| Participants |
Population: 186 adults (18+ years) with persistent asthma Baseline characteristics: mean age 50 years; FEV₁ unknown % predicted Concomitant ICS used by 100% of participants Inclusion criteria: 18 years of age or older with documented evidence of asthma within previous 2 years who were receiving 1500 to 2000 μg/d of BUD or equivalent ICS, excluding fluticasone propionate, for at least 3 months before the start of baseline Exclusion criteria: not reported |
|
| Interventions | • Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 500/50 μg twice daily • Fluticasone propionate 500 μg twice daily Delivery as DPI |
|
| Outcomes | Primary efficacy endpoint: minimum acceptable daily dose of ICS | |
| Notes | Sponsored by GSK. High dropout rate. Only 8% completed the study | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind |
| Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events | High risk | Causation of SAEs not independently assessed |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Only 14/186 (8%) completed the study |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Data on GSK website |