Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;2018(12):CD006922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006922.pub4
Methods A multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group comparison of the efficacy of SERETIDE* twice daily and fluticasone propionate twice daily (both via Diskus*/ACCUHALER*, Inhaler) when tapering the inhaled corticosteroid dose in asthmatic adults
Carried out over 26 weeks from May 2000 to July 2001, at 34 centres in 10 countries (Australia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Latvia, New Zealand, Spain, United Kingdom)
Participants Population: 186 adults (18+ years) with persistent asthma 
Baseline characteristics: mean age 50 years; FEV₁ unknown % predicted
Concomitant ICS used by 100% of participants 
Inclusion criteria: 18 years of age or older with documented evidence of asthma within previous 2 years who were receiving 1500 to 2000 μg/d of BUD or equivalent ICS, excluding fluticasone propionate, for at least 3 months before the start of baseline 
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions • Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 500/50 μg twice daily
• Fluticasone propionate 500 μg twice daily
Delivery as DPI
Outcomes Primary efficacy endpoint: minimum acceptable daily dose of ICS
Notes Sponsored by GSK. High dropout rate. Only 8% completed the study
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events High risk Causation of SAEs not independently assessed
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk Only 14/186 (8%) completed the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data on GSK website