Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;2018(12):CD006922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006922.pub4
Methods A 1‐year, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group comparison of the efficacy of Seretide (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination Accuhaler) and Flixotide (fluticasone propionate Accuhaler) when ICS dose is down‐titrated in adults with asthma who have previously received Seretide 500/50 μg twice daily for at least 4 weeks
Study conducted over 52 weeks from March 2002 to February 2006, at 3 centres in Australia
Participants Population: 82 adolescents and adults (18 to 80 years) with asthma 
Baseline characteristics: mean age 47 years; FEV₁ unknown % predicted
Concomitant ICS used by 100% of participants 
Inclusion criteria: between 18 and 80 years of age with clinical diagnosis of asthma according to ATS criteria for at least 6 months before enrolment; currently receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol via dry powder inhaler or metered dose inhaler (with or without spacer) at a dose of 500/50 μg twice daily or 250/25 μg 2 inhalations twice daily for a minimum of 4 weeks before enrolment 
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions • Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 500/50, 250/50, or 100/50 μg twice daily (reduced incrementally)
• Fluticasone propionate 500, 250, or 100 μg twice daily (reduced incrementally)
Delivery was DPI
Outcomes Primary efficacy endpoint: average daily fluticasone propionate dose (μg/d) from week 0 to completion/withdrawal, including study medication and exacerbation medication
Notes SAE data included run‐in
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events High risk Causation of SAEs not independently assessed
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk 60/82 (73%) completed the study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Data on GSK website