Methods | A 1‐year, randomised, double‐blind, parallel‐group
comparison of the efficacy of Seretide (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol
combination Accuhaler) and Flixotide (fluticasone propionate Accuhaler) when
ICS dose is down‐titrated in adults with asthma who have previously
received Seretide 500/50 μg twice daily for at least 4 weeks Study conducted over 52 weeks from March 2002 to February 2006, at 3 centres in Australia |
|
Participants |
Population: 82 adolescents and adults (18 to 80 years) with
asthma Baseline characteristics: mean age 47 years; FEV₁ unknown % predicted Concomitant ICS used by 100% of participants Inclusion criteria: between 18 and 80 years of age with clinical diagnosis of asthma according to ATS criteria for at least 6 months before enrolment; currently receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol via dry powder inhaler or metered dose inhaler (with or without spacer) at a dose of 500/50 μg twice daily or 250/25 μg 2 inhalations twice daily for a minimum of 4 weeks before enrolment Exclusion criteria: not reported |
|
Interventions | • Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol 500/50, 250/50, or 100/50
μg twice daily (reduced incrementally) • Fluticasone propionate 500, 250, or 100 μg twice daily (reduced incrementally) Delivery was DPI |
|
Outcomes | Primary efficacy endpoint: average daily fluticasone propionate dose (μg/d) from week 0 to completion/withdrawal, including study medication and exacerbation medication | |
Notes | SAE data included run‐in | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind |
Independent Assessment of causation (detection bias) Asthma‐related events | High risk | Causation of SAEs not independently assessed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 60/82 (73%) completed the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Data on GSK website |