Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 20;3(5):e10167. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10167

Table 3.

Strength of the Zoledronic Acid + Rowing Effect (Rowing‐Only Group as Reference) in Models Adjusting for Baseline Values and Clinical/Demographic Factors

Cortical bone volume (mm3) Cortical Thickness Index (mm) Buckling ratio (BRe)
Proximal tibia β ± SE p β ± SE p β ± SE p
Fully adjusted, all participants (n = 20) 345 (109) a 0.006 0.012 (0.004) 0.013 4.51 (1.73) 0.019
Fully adjusted, chronic SCI only (n = 18) 410 (100) a 0.001 0.014 (0.005) 0.007 5.20 (1.80) 0.012
Fully adjusted, males only, no statin users (n = 16) 404 (91) a 0.001 0.017 (0.004) 0.001 5.52 (1.35) b 0.001
Distal femur
Fully adjusted, all participants (n = 20) 471 (225) c 0.05 0.016 (0.006) c 0.009 5.47 (2.04) d 0.015
Fully adjusted, chronic SCI only (n = 18) 490 (256) c 0.076 0.017 (0.006) c 0.015 6.20 (2.10) d 0.009
Fully adjusted, males only, no statin users (n = 16) 400 (256) c 0.14 0.014 (0.006) c 0.04 4.94 (2.28) d 0.05

All models are adjusted for baseline bone geometry values.

SCI = Spinal cord injury.

a

Adjusting for baseline leg lean mass (p = 0.007 to 0.04).

b

Adjusting for total rowing work (p = 0.05).

c

Adjusting for age injury (p = 0.000 to 0.003), baseline leg lean mass (p = 0.000 to 0.001), baseline 25‐OH vitamin D level (p = 0.01 to 0.03).

d

Adjusting for age at injury (p = 0.001 to 0.02), baseline leg lean mass (p = 0.000 to 0.01).eBR has no units; beta coefficients are multiplied by 1000 here for ease of interpretation.