Table 1.
Comparison of BVD control programmes and BVD status in six European countries in 2017.
Elements | Countries | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DE | FR (Brittany) | IE | NL | SE | UK (Scotland) | |
Herd level prevalence (breeding herds) | 0.08% | unknown | 2% | 9% | 0%–free | 10% |
Type of programme | Mandatory | Voluntary | Mandatory | Voluntary | Mandatory | Mandatory |
Type of testing–screening/case finding | Ear notch, blood/serum | Bulk milk, ear notch, blood/serum | Ear notch | Bulk milk, ear notch, blood/serum | – | Ear notch, blood/serum |
Type of testing - monitoring freedom of disease | Ear notch, blood/serum | Bulk milk, ear notch, blood/serum | Ear notch | Ear notch, blood/serum | Bulk milk, blood/serum | Blood/serum |
Vaccines licensed for use | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Funding | Private and public | Private | Private and public | Private | Private and public | Private |
Most important herd level risk factors for introduction: | ||||||
1 | Introduction of imported cattle | Boundary contact with neighboring cattle herds | Boundary contact with neighboring cattle herds | High cattle density | Introduction of imported cattle | Delayed removal of known PI animal(s) |
2 | Introduction of TI cattle | Introduction of cattle | Introduction of pregnant cattle | Introduction of pregnant cattle | – | Introduction of cattle with unknown status |
3 | Introduction of pregnant cattle | Presence of fattening unit | Indirect transmission through personnel | Indirect transmission through professional visitors | – | Boundary contact with neighboring cattle herds |
DE, Germany; FR, France; IE, Ireland; NL, Netherlands; SE, Sweden; UK, United Kingdom.