Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 30;10:923. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00923

Table 4.

Treatment group differences.

Excluded + risk-accepting passenger vs. Excluded + passive passenger (effect of risk-accepting passenger) Excluded + risk-accepting passenger vs. Included (fair play) + risk-accepting passenger (effect of exclusion)
Est. 95% CI p-value Est. 95% CI p-value

Study 1: males (N = 112) Failed to stop (OR) 2.09 1.14 3.81 0.02 0.63 0.35 1.12 0.11
Percent time in red (β) 3.60 –0.72 7.93 0.10 –3.73 –8.22 0.75 0.10
Pass slow vehicle (OR) 3.41 1.03 11.35 0.05 1.04 0.32 3.42 0.94
Study 2: females (N = 115) Failed to stop (OR) 1.40 0.84 2.32 0.19 0.60 0.36 0.98 0.04
Percent time in red (β) 2.56 –2.24 7.36 0.30 –5.30 –10.16 –0.45 0.03
Pass slow vehicle (OR) 9.94 1.16 85.31 0.04 1.46 0.44 4.81 0.53

Controlling for self-esteem; Odds ratio is the effect size for GLIMMIX model with binary outcomes and the beta is the effect size for mixed models. The significant (<0.05) p values are in bold.