Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Ecosyst Serv. 2017 Jun 26;26(Pt A):79–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.008

Table 1.

Description of scenarios based on key drivers (Kohler et al., 2017b).

Key driver Positive scenario Trend scenario Negative
scenario
Touristic services, i.e. managed grassland Very important Important Less important
Demand for local products High demand Moderate demand No demand
Demand for areas for settlement or energy production Low demand Low demand High demand
Supplementary income (on-/off-farm) Important Important Very important
Farm succession Guaranteed In most cases certain In most cases uncertain
Land-use structural change Intensification of some sites in the valleys/slight increase in abandonment at higher altitudes Intensification of some sites in the valleys/slight increase in abandonment at higher altitudes Farmers expand their businesses or stop farming
Subsidies Direct payments important for income Direct payments important for income Direct payments do not guarantee secure income
Regulations No retirement of livestock farmers Retirement of some small-scale livestock farmers Retirement of small-scale livestock farmers
Cooperation among farmers/with municipality Creative cooperation and new income possibilities Good Less cooperation
Sustaining cultural landscape Important Important Not important
Climate change No influence on farming system, but on some farming practices (e.g. irrigation) No influence on farming system, but on some farming practices (e.g. irrigation) No influence on farming system, but on some farming practices (e.g. irrigation)