Skip to main content
. 2019 May 17;10:2204. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10135-x

Table 1.

Further hemodynamic description of both experimental PAH models

MCT (n = 5) MCT + palbociclib (n = 5) Su/Hox (n = 8) Su/Hox + palbociclib (n = 7)
BW [g] 452 ± 30 (pre) 420 ± 37 (pre) 365 ± 20 (pre) 363 ± 16 (pre)
451 ± 37 (post) 405 ± 33 (post) 391 ± 19 (post) 362 ± 28 (post)
HR [bpm] 342 ± 34 (pre) 342 ± 39 (pre) 349 ± 28 (pre) 368 ± 16 (pre)
339 ± 40 (post) 339 ± 24 (post) 337 ± 17 (post) 317 ± 42** (post)
SVI [µl] per 100 g BW 46.8 ± 4.5 (pre) 49.7 ± 7.7 (pre) 35.5 ± 4.6 (pre) 35.3 ± 3.2 (pre)
34.7 ± 9.9§ (post) 55.4 ± 10.7## (post) 33.3 ± 4.9 (post) 54.9 ± 11.9****,#### (post)
CI [ml/min] per 100 g BW 15.9 ± 1.9 (pre) 16.7 ± 1.5 (pre) 12.4 ± 1.5 (pre) 12.8 ± 1.1 (pre)
11.9 ± 3.9§ (post) 17.7 ± 2.4# (post) 11.2 ± 1.7 (post) 16.6 ± 3.5 **,### (post)
RVID [mm] 4.2 ± 0.2 (pre) 4.1 ± 0.3 (pre) 4.7 ± 0.3 (pre) 4.7 ± 0.3 (pre)
6.0 ± 0.8§§§§ (post) 4.5 ± 0.4### (post) 5.3 ± 0.5§§ (post) 4.3 ± 0.5### (post)
TAPSE [mm] 2.2 ± 0.2 (pre) 2.4 ± 0.1 (pre) 1.49 ± 0.07 (pre) 1.46 ± 0.08 (pre)
1.8 ± 0.3§ (post) 2.3 ± 0.2## (post) 1.3 ± 0.1§§ (post) 2.1 ± 0.1 ****,#### (post)

Data, i.e., before (pre) and at the end of the treatment (post), are presented as mean ± SD and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Newman–Keuls post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. MCT rat model: §p < 0.05, §§§§p  < 0.0001 for post-versus pre-treatment of MCT; #p  < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 for post-treatment MCT  +  Palbociclib versus MCT. Su/Hox model: §§p < 0.01 for post-versus pre-treatment of Su/Hox; **p < 0.01, ****p  < 0.0001 for post-versus pre-treatment of Su/Hox + Palbociclib; ###p  < 0.001, ####p  < 0.0001 for post-treatment Su/Hox  +  Palbociclib versus Su/Hox.

BW body weight, HR heart rate, SVI stroke volume index, CI cardiac index, RVID right ventricular internal diameter, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Source data are provided as a Source