Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;5(5):e01719. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01719

Table 3.

Method accuracy with spiked alkaloids into the tomato leaf matrix (n = 3).

Analyte Spiked Concentration
Recovery
CV
(ng/mL) % %
(R)-nicotine 944.6 104.6 2.4
1889.2 107.4 1.3
3778.4 103.9 0.5
(S)-nicotine 944.6 108.8 3.3
1889.2 106.2 0.7
3778.4 104.9 1.9
(R)-nornicotine 428.8 114.5 3.7
857.6 115.7 0.2
1715.2 113.2 2.6
(S)-nornicotine 428.8 112.8 2.0
857.6 113.4 1.1
1715.2 109.0 1.1
(R)-anatabine 422.0 103.4 2.9
844.0 104.8 1.4
1688.0 102.7 0.4
(S)-anatabine 422.0 102.6 1.7
844.0 103.4 1.3
1688.0 101.9 0.7
(R)-anabasine 213.6 101.4 3.6
427.2 104.0 1.0
854.4 102.9 1.8
(S)-anabasine 213.6 107.2 3.5
427.2 108.9 1.0
854.4 107.3 1.8