Table 3.
Method accuracy with spiked alkaloids into the tomato leaf matrix (n = 3).
| Analyte | Spiked Concentration |
Recovery |
CV |
|---|---|---|---|
| (ng/mL) | % | % | |
| (R)-nicotine | 944.6 | 104.6 | 2.4 |
| 1889.2 | 107.4 | 1.3 | |
| 3778.4 | 103.9 | 0.5 | |
| (S)-nicotine | 944.6 | 108.8 | 3.3 |
| 1889.2 | 106.2 | 0.7 | |
| 3778.4 | 104.9 | 1.9 | |
| (R)-nornicotine | 428.8 | 114.5 | 3.7 |
| 857.6 | 115.7 | 0.2 | |
| 1715.2 | 113.2 | 2.6 | |
| (S)-nornicotine | 428.8 | 112.8 | 2.0 |
| 857.6 | 113.4 | 1.1 | |
| 1715.2 | 109.0 | 1.1 | |
| (R)-anatabine | 422.0 | 103.4 | 2.9 |
| 844.0 | 104.8 | 1.4 | |
| 1688.0 | 102.7 | 0.4 | |
| (S)-anatabine | 422.0 | 102.6 | 1.7 |
| 844.0 | 103.4 | 1.3 | |
| 1688.0 | 101.9 | 0.7 | |
| (R)-anabasine | 213.6 | 101.4 | 3.6 |
| 427.2 | 104.0 | 1.0 | |
| 854.4 | 102.9 | 1.8 | |
| (S)-anabasine | 213.6 | 107.2 | 3.5 |
| 427.2 | 108.9 | 1.0 | |
| 854.4 | 107.3 | 1.8 |