Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers. 2018 Dec 18;87(5):948–961. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12447

Table 1.

Descriptives, Reliabilities, and Intra-class Correlation Coefficients for Study Variables

M(SD) α ICC

S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
Emotion regulation goals
    1. Pro-hedonic 4.95(1.05) 4.46(1.09) 2.97(1.37) .74 .66 .78
    2. Contra-hedonic 2.29(1.15) 2.19(1.28) 1.35(.42) .80 .84 .87
    3. Pro-social 4.98(.96) 4.22(1.26) 3.20(1.40) .84 .89 .60
    4. Impression management 5.10(1.03) 3.75(1.38) 2.47(1.33) .85 .90 .59
Emotion regulation strategies
    5. Reappraisal 5.20(0.91) 4.89(1.23) 3.47(1.47) .76 .91 .68
    6. Suppression 3.84(1.23) 3.98(1.36) 3.08(1.36) .76 .82 .40
    7. Situation selection -- 4.21(.71) 2.68(1.32) -- .76 .45
    8. Situation modification -- 4.89(1.17) 3.09(1.85) -- .79 .47
    9. Distraction -- 4.78(1.26) 3.02(1.39) -- .83 .45

Note. S1 = Study 1; S2 = Study 2. S3 = Study 3. Situation selection, situation modification, and distraction were not measured in Study 1. Standard deviations are in parentheses. Cronbach’s alpha reflects internal consistency (not calculated in Study 3 because assessed with single daily items). ICC = intra-class correlations, which reflect between-person variance in daily measures.