. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Behav Med. 2018 Dec 12;42(3):480–492. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-0001-1

Table 4.

Multiple Regression Analyses to Predict Patient Outcomes

	Relationship Quality	PCS	MCS	CESD	Regimen Distress	Self-Care	HbA1c
Age	−.30**	−.33**	−.09	.03	−.19	−.06	.13
Marriage length	.20⁺	.02	.17	−.06	−.03	.21⁺	−.04
Partner shared appraisal	.13⁺	−.06	.11	−.11	−.16^*	.07	−.02
Patient shared appraisal	.10	−.23**	.10	−.01	−.06	.06	−.08
CIS index	.34^***	−.12	−.08	−.05	.21^*	−.03	.11
CIS index × patient appraisal		.30^***			−.20^*
Emotional Support	Relationship Quality	PCS	MCS	CESD	Regimen Distress	Self-Care	HbAlc
Age	−.21^*	−.26^*	−.08	−.02	−.23⁺	.11	.18
Marriage length	.15	−.03	.17	−.04	−.02	.18	−.05
Partner shared appraisal	.12^*	−.10	.09	−.08	−.12⁺	.06	−.00
Patient shared appraisal	.02	− 32^***	.05	.09	.01	−.10	.06
Emotional support	.56^***	.01	.08	−.30^***	.03	.07	.11
Emotional support × patient appraisal		.34^***			−.21^*	.19^*	−.23^*

Notes: CIS index = collaboration and instrumental support; PCS = physical component score; MCS = mental component score; patient and partner shared illness appraisal scored 1=shared, 0 = individual; n.s. = not significant;

⁺

p < .10;

p < .05;

^***

p < .001