Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 12;123(5):857–865. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy220

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic trees resulting from the maximum likelihood analysis of (A) the plastome data set of the present study and (B) the SNP data set derived from RADseq in a previous study (Heckenhauer et al., 2018). (A) Bootstrap percentages (≥90 %) from maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses and posterior probabilities (BI >0.90) are given in this order. The two major clades (I and II) and the indicated genera/groups of Shorea: 1 Doona, 2 Anthoshorea, 3 Hopea, 4 Richetia, 5 Parashorea, 6 Shorea (selangan batu/balau) and 7 Rubroshorea. (B) For comparative reasons, the tree is pruned to species investigated in this study. Bootstrap percentages (≥90 %) from maximum likelihood analysis are given. Individuals are coloured according to different (sub-)sections. Sections and subsections according to Ashton are given: A, section Anthoshorea; B, section Doona; C, section Mutica; C1, subsection Mutica; C2, subsection Auriculatae; D, section Pachycarpae; E, section Brachypterae; E1, subsection Brachypterae; E2, subsection Smithiana; F, section Rubella; G, section Ovalis; H, section Shorea; H1, subsection Barbata; H2, subsection Shorea; I, section Richetioides subsection Richetioides; J, section Dryobalanoides; J1, subsection Sphaerocarpae; J2, Dryobalanoides; K, section Hopea subsection Hopea.