Skip to main content
. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0217057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217057

Table 2. CESIR simulation: Selection rates (%) for the 45 irrelevant variables, grouped together by prevalence (9 variables per interval).

Prevalence of irrelevant variables
0.006%–0.016% 0.02%–0.06% 0.07%–0.22% 0.25%–0.8% 0.9%–3%
Logistic regression 10 21 18 15 15
Firth correction 0 1 7 11 11
Ridge regression 0 5 8 8 7
Lasso 24 35 36 33 36
Boosting 1 11 28 36 37