Skip to main content
. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0217228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217228

Table 3. Per patient relative volume error for routine and corrected automatic segmentations.

Routine Corrected
Rad Res1 Res2 Res3 RA
Patient1 8.89% 6.56% 11.73% 4.20% 0.70%
Patient2 8.52% 4.44% 1.39% 4.59% 3.87%
Patient3 1.84% 4.42% 2.45% 5.57% 5.41%
Patient4 1.15% 6.19% 2.07% 2.25% 4.56%
Patient5 4.72% 0.24% 3.47% 0.93% 0.93%
Patient6 2.81% 1.09% 4.47% 6.30% 6.62%
Patient7 3.49% 0.26% 1.17% 3.56% 3.32%
Patient8 3.51% 1.10% 3.37% 4.88% 3.91%
Patient9 2.27% 0.87% 0.09% 2.11% 2.62%
Patient10 22.62% 22.89% 22.18% 1.62% 0.09%
Patient11 7.24% 2.69% 2.12% 0.78% 0.87%
Patient12 3.10% 0.17% 2.40% 7.73% 7.73%
Patient13 2.24% 0.79% 5.97% 7.86% 6.72%
Patient14 6.06% 4.93% 4.61% 3.56% 2.54%
Patient15 11.39% 5.24% 6.50% 0.52% 0.43%
Patient16 5.07% 3.37% 4.29% 5.15% 4.51%
Patient17 1.13% 1.34% 4.21% 2.66% 2.62%
Patient18* 6.79% 1.17% 10.58% 2.71% 1.83%
Patient19 9.14% 4.28% 2.49% 1.57% 1.38%
Patient20 6.12% 1.42% 2.87% 1.51% 1.42%
Patient21 4.31% 2.30% 0.49% 3.91% 3.93%

Case with the highest inter-observer variability among manual routine* and corrected segmentations: 6.27% and 3.50%, respectively.