Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1292–1302. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001941

Table 3.

Summary of Findings from 14 Meta-Analyses of the Relationship Between Pre-Pregnancy and Early Pregnancy Physical Activity and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Author, year Study Design Effect (95% CI)
PRE-PREGNANCY PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Aune, 2016 Cohort (N=8) sRR=0.78 (0.61-1.00)
Tobias, 2011 RCT (N=7) pOR=0.45 (0.28-0.75)
EARLY PREGNANCY PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
iWIP Collaborative Group, 2017* RCT (N=10) OR=0.67 (0.46 to 0.99)
Aune, 2016 Cohort (N=5)
RCT (N=12)
Combined (N=17)
sRR=0.97 (0.73-1.28)
sRR=0.69 (0.50-0.96)
sRR=0.80 (0.64-1.00)
DaSilva, 2017 Cohort (N=6)
RCT (N=10)
sOR=0.75 (0.55-1.01)
sOR=0.67 (0.49-0.92)
DiMascio, 2016 RCT (N=4) sRR=0.51 (0.31-0.82)
Han, 2011 RCT (N=3) sRR=1.10 (0.66-1.84)
Mudhravdata, 2015 RCT (N=3) pOR=0.77 (0.33-1.79)
Oostdam, 2011 RCT (N=3) risk difference=
−0.05 (−0.20-0.10)
Russo, 2015 RCT (N=10) sRR=0.72 (0.58-0.91)
Sanabria-M, 2015 RCT (N=8) sRR=0.69 (0.52-0.91)
Song, 2016 RCT (N=10) sRR=0.77 (0.54-1.09)
Tobias, 2011 RCT (N=5) pOR=0.76 (0.70-0.83)
Yin, 2014 RCT (N=6) sRR=0.91 (0.57-1.44)
Yu, 2017 RCT (N=5) SMD=0.59 (0.39-0.88)
Zheng, 2017 RCT (N=4) SMD=0.62 (0.43-0.89)

Note: Studies with statistically significant findings are in bold type.

*

Identified in the updated search. CI = confidence interval; OR= odds ratio; RCT = randomized controlled trial; sRR=standardized relative risk, sOR=standardized odds ratio, pOR=pooled odds ratio, and SMD=standardized mean difference.