Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;98(6):2598–2607. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez004

Table 5.

Statistical evaluation of MICs and standard deviations (± SDs) of the antibiotics showing significant differences among treatments, days, and interactions between treatments and days.

Antibiotic Effect of day Effect of treatment* Effect of interaction
Amoxicillin—clavulanic acid 38>17 (P < 0.0001) AB>NC, CC, FA, SA (P < 0.0001)** P < 0.0001
Ampicillin 38>17 (P < 0.0001) AB>NC, CC, FA, SA (P < 0.0001) P < 0.0001
Azithromycin 38>17 (P < 0.0001) NC>AB (P = 0.02) P = 0.11
Cefoxitin 38>17 (P < 0.0001) AB>SA (P = 0.02) P = 0.24
Ceftriaxone P = 0.38 AB>FA, SA (P = 0.03) P = 0.44
Chloramphenicol 38>17 (P < 0.0001) P = 0.14 P = 0.93
Ciprofloxacin 38>17 (P = 0.04) P = 0.25 P = 0.44
Gentamicin 38>17 (P < 0.0001) P = 0.81 P = 0.03
Nalidixic acid 38>17 (P < 0.0001) P = 0.05 P = 0.86
Streptomycin 38>17 (P < 0.0001) P = 0.72 P = 0.09
Sulfisoxazole 38>17 (P < 0.0001) P = 0.14 P = 0.85
Tetracycline 38>17 (P < 0.0001) AB<NC, SA (P = 0.02)*** P < 0.0001
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 38>17 (P < 0.0001) P = 0.17 P < 0.002

NC, negative control without E. coli challenge; CC, E. coli challenge control; AB, ampicillin; FA, feed additive based on organic acids; SA, multistrain synbiotic.

*MIXED procedure and multiple comparisons of the MICs adjusted according to the Tukey–Kramer test at a significance level of 5%.

**In-depth analysis did not show significant differences between CC-AB on day 38.

***In-depth analysis did not show significant differences between NC-AB, AB-FA, and AB-SA on day 17 only.