Table 2.
Summary of the lightweight architectures and the corresponding group number.
| Group # | Lightweight Architecture |
|---|---|
| 1 | Octet Microlattice (this study) |
| 2 | Kelvin Microlattice (this study) |
| 3 | Cubic Microlattice (this study) |
| 4 | Commercial Cubic Microlattice |
| 5 | Titanium Octet Trussα |
| 6 | Rigid Polyurethane Foamβ |
| 7 | Aluminum Foamγ |
| 8 | Commercial Polyurethane Foamδ |
| 9 | Ceramic Composite Microlattice A |
| 10 | First Order Octet Microlattice (this study) |
| 11 | Second Order Octet Microlattice (this study) |
αThe apparent density of the Ti octet lattice was calculated by assuming that the density of the bulk metal alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) is 4.43 g/cm3.
βThe compressive strength of the rigid polyurethane foam is estimated based on a reported plot.
γThe compressive strength of the aluminum foam is estimated based on a reported plot of compressive strength vs. relative density, and the density of the foam is estimated by assuming the bulk density of the metal alloy is 2.7 g/cm3.
δThe compressive strength of the commercial polyurethane foam is the reported mean yield strength.