Skip to main content
. 2019 May 4;8:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100402

Table 1.

Evidence for whether the relationship between social relationships and health satisfies the Bradford Hill Guidelines (original and revised).

Guidelines (revised) Guideline (original) Evidence (yes/no) Evidence that the guideline has been satisfied for social relationships and health
Experiment Yes (but in animals) Animal experiments demonstrate a link between mother's care and mortality; one randomised trial in humans indicates reduced depression resulting from improved perception of social support.
Direct – effect size greater than combined effect of confounders Strength Yes The effect size is very strong – odds ratio of 1.5
Direct – Appropriate temporal/special proximity Temporality Yes The effect comes after the cause and occurs in as little as 1.5 years.
Direct – dose responsiveness and reversibility Biological gradient Yes Animal experiments where subjects were deprived of contact led to increased mortality
Mechanistic – plausible mechanism of action Biological plausibility Yes Stress buffering, main effect models are plausible explanations
Mechanistic – coherence Coherence Yes Coheres with animal experiments and studies of foster children who were deprived of mother contact.
Parallel – replicability Replicability Yes There were 148 studies included in Holt-Lunstad review.
Parallel – Similarity Similarity Yes Similar studies show consistent results.