Skip to main content
. 2019 May 6;9(5):e026129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026129

Table 3.

Comparison of fit indices to the computing factor structures of CES-D to the Eritrean refugee sample

Proposed model of CES-D Sample χ2 (df) CFI χ2/df GFI TLI SRMR RMSEA P values
1. Four correlated factors model (Sheehan’s item allocation)
 Correlated error terms Total sample (n=562) 588.62 (158) 0.916 3.725 0.903 0.899 0.0475 0.07 p<0.001
 Uncorrelated error terms Total sample (n=562) 704.346 (164) 0.895 4.295 0.882 0.878 0.0504 0.077 p<0.001
2. First-order four factors with second order model (Sheehan’s item allocation)
 Correlated error terms Total sample (n=562) 619.63 (161) 0.911 3.819 0.897 0.895 0.048 0.071 p<0.001
 Uncorrelated error terms Total sample (n=562) 709.251 (166) 0.894 4.273 0.881 0.879 0.0508 0.076 P<0.001
3. Two correlated factors structure
 Correlated error terms Total sample (n=562) 302.801 (150) 0.97 2.019 0.95 0.962 0.0391 0.043 p<0.001
4. First-order twofactors, second-order common factor
 Correlated error terms Total sample (n=562) 271.65 (144) 0.975 1.886 0.955 0.967 0.0378 0.04 p<0.001
 Correlated error terms Female (n=304) 239.495 0.965 1.5886 0.929 0.956 0.0484 0.044 p<0.001
 Correlated error terms Male (n=258) 284.592 0.952 1.801 0.901 0.943 0.0479 0.056 p<0.001

CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CFI, Comparative Fit index; GFI, Goodness of Fit Index; RMSEA, root mean error of approximation; SRMR, standardised root mean residual; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; χ2/df=χ2 to degree of freedom.