Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2018 Jun 25;15(7):531–534. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0036-9

Figure 1. Results from in silico and in vitro validation of deTiN.

Figure 1

(a) TiN estimates at different in silico simulated TiN levels. (b) deTiN estimates at different in vitro mixed TiN levels. MAE = mean absolute error. (c, d) Sensitivity to detect mutations with deTiN (red) and without deTiN (blue) at (c) different in silico simulated TiN levels and (d) in vitro mixed TiN levels. (a, c) deTiN results from n=5 in silico independent simulation experiments. Dots represent weighted average and error bars represent standard errors. (b, d) Results from n=1 sequencing experiment. Error bars depict 95% confidence intervals on TiN estimates. (a, b) Dotted blue lines indicate y=x.