Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;2019(5):CD009760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub4

Monti 2008a.

Methods Randomised sham‐controlled cross‐over trial
Participants Country: Italy
8 right‐handed chronic non‐fluent aphasic patients (4 women), age in years (mean ± SD, 60.38 ± 11.99), education in years (mean ± SD, 10.62 ± 4.86), mean time from stroke onset to study entry 3.93 ± 1.89 years
Inclusion criteria: not stated
Exclusion criteria: severely impaired auditory verbal comprehension (Token Test < 8), severe apraxia of speech, seizures in the last 12 months, psychiatric disease and dementia
Interventions Each participant underwent 2 different treatment conditions (A: A‐tDCS 2 mA; B: C‐tDCS 2 mA; C: S‐tDCS. Each for 10 minutes over the left Broca's region, order of intervention randomised) in the following order:
‐ picture‐naming task + A or C, at least 7 days rest period, picture‐naming task + C or A
‐ picture‐naming task + B or C, at least 7 days rest period, picture‐naming task + C or B
Outcomes Outcomes were reported at baseline and at the end of intervention phase:
‐ naming accuracy in per cent (continuous; ranging from 0 to 100 with a higher value indicating better performance)
‐ reaction time for naming pictures (0 to infinity with a lower value indicating better performance)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Microsoft Excel random number generator (Priori 2012 [pers comm])
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A third person, uninvolved in the rest of the experiment, assigned participants to their stimulation groups (Priori 2012 [pers comm])
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 Objective outcomes Unclear risk Objective outcome measures: participants were blinded, whereas personnel were not
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk Outcome assessor was unaware of stimulation type
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk Objective outcomes: all participants completed the study. No treatment withdrawals, no trial group changes and no major adverse events stated
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All outcomes listed in the 'Methods' section reported; no published protocol could be identified
Other bias Low risk No other bias identified