Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;2019(5):CD009760. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009760.pub4
Study Reason for exclusion
Fiori 2011 Not a genuine RCT (pseudo‐randomisation of intervention)
Fridriksson 2011 Not a genuine RCT
Holland 2011 Not a genuine RCT (pseudo‐randomisation of intervention)
Lee 2013 Inappropriate comparator intervention (2 different applications of tDCS have been compared)
Monti 2008b In order to test the specificity of findings of Monti 2008a, this trial stimulated a biological implausible area (occipital cortex) to improve aphasia and therefore has been excluded
NCT02514044 Irrelevant comparison: both groups received tDCS
NCT03486782 Irrelevant comparison: all 3 groups received anodal tDCS
Richardson 2015 Irrelevant comparison: both groups received tDCS
Vines 2011 Not a genuine RCT

RCT: randomised controlled trial
 tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation